This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Intelligent Management

Deming and Theory of Constraints for CEOs and Executive Teams for the Age of Complexity. Ess3ntial Critical Chain Project Management

  • THE DECALOGUE METHOD
    • The Problem for Every Business
    • The Systemic Solution
    • synchronize competencies
    • How It Works
    • business insight and foresight through systemic cause and effect reasoning
    • Our Education Modules for Systemic Management
  • about us
    • Dr. Domenico Lepore
    • the founders
    • Intelligent Management Success Stories
    • Our Books
    • Clients
    • Expanding Spiral of Positive Systemic Results with Intelligent Management
  • blog & books
    • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
    • Our publications
  • ITALIA
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Systems Thinking / The Traditional Hierarchy Organization Doesn’t Work Anymore

Apr 18 2017

The Traditional Hierarchy Organization Doesn’t Work Anymore

Screen Shot 2017-04-18 at 7.59.13 AM

Why are people still stuck in adopting a traditional hierarchy and functional organization structure when there are clearly so many drawbacks? When organizations are created and organized in a matrix of vertical hierarchy and functions,
 an inevitable consequence is the existence of a series of “walls” or divisions that inhibit the resources involved in producing an optimal result toward the overall goal. Communication gets slowed down or completely blocked, innovation struggles to emerge through the ranks and bureaucracy, projects are delayed and go over budget, quality suffers, and reaction time to changing market demands is too slow.

Individuals suffer because they do not have the authority to carry out
the tasks for which they are responsible. Careers are limited because people work for a boss who has to improve their own performance in a vertical way. This means that competencies, both technical and managerial, do not find a natural way to develop. This creates frustration due to artificial “ceilings.”

Even more dramatically, ‘silo sickness’ means that the larger implications of cause and effect relationships that exist in organizations are totally disguised. It takes time for the effects of a cause to propagate through a system. People have no means of understanding the implications of their local, siloed decisions on the big picture. Even the heads of functions are blind-sided to them.

A mechanistic worldview

The hierarchical/functional organization reflects a mechanistic, Newtonian worldview, where separation is feasible and dynamics are linear. This attitude lacks awareness and understanding of our new reality that is dominated by increasing complexity, meaning unprecedented levels of interdependencies.

To move forward, we have to question the assumptions, i.e. mental models that account for the persistence of traditional hierarchies in spite of their shortcomings. Over the years of our on-the-field research and development, at Intelligent Management we have come to summarize the major assumptions of the conflict adopt a hierarchical structure vs. not adopt a hierarchical structure as:

  • A hierarchy can only be vertical;
  • Control has to be exercised equally over all components of the organization;
  • The global optimum is equal to the sum of the local optima.

To challenge these assumptions operationally we need a plan of action that can transform an organization into a whole system. Our work at Intelligent Management began with the systemic vision of Deming and statistically controlled processes (Theory of Profound Knowledge) and grew to embrace the concept of managing a constraint (Theory of Constraints). By working on a synergy of these approaches known as the Decalogue methodology, we came to see that in order to bring together cohesively the idea of constraint with the idea of a statistically controlled system we have to orchestrate statistically controlled processes and subordinate them to a well-defined (and very statistically stable) part of our system, the constraint. If these stable, i.e. reliable, well orchestrated, processes all have the capacity to subordinate to the chosen constraint, then all we need in order to protect the whole system is a “buffer” in front of the constraint; needless to say, the oscillation of the buffer must be controlled statistically. We created a concept for a systemic organization that we refer to as the ‘choked tube’.

Screen Shot 2016-05-25 at 11.20.32 AM

 

From silos to System

From a philosophical as well as scientific viewpoint, the Decalogue attempts to shift management from the obsolete, Newtonian worldview in which the results of the whole organization equal the sum of its individual, separate and hierarchical parts, towards a systemic and interdependent network. The shift is achieved by combining the allegedly “reductionist” approach of the Theory of Constraints with a purely systemic view based on interdependencies and interactions. It does so in practical terms by:

 

  1. building interdependent processes managed through the control of variation
  2. subordinating these interdependencies to a strategically chosen element of the system called constraint
  3. designing the organization as a network of interdependent projects with a goal

This work has developed into an organizational design for our age of complexity. We call it the Network of Projects.

Sign up to our blog here and shift your thinking towards broader, systemic possibilities for yourself and your organization.

About the Author

Angela Montgomery Ph.D. is Partner and Co-founder of Intelligent Management and author of the business novel+ website  The Human Constraint . This downloadable novel uses narrative to look at how the Deming approach and the Theory of Constraints can create the organization of the future, based on collaboration, network and social innovation.  She is co-author with Dr. Domenico Lepore, founder, and Dr. Giovanni Siepe of  ‘Quality, Involvement, Flow: The Systemic Organization’  from CRC Press, New York.

Written by angela montgomery · Categorized: Systems Thinking, systems view of the world, Theory of Constraints · Tagged: complexity, Decalogue methodology, Deming, hierarchy, interdependencies, network of projects, theory of constraints

Search Form

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.

Search Form

Recent Posts

  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization January 20, 2023
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18 January 11, 2023
  • Why HR Is So Much More than a Department – A Systemic Approach Part 17 December 21, 2022
  • Are Your Management Methods and Style Obsolete? December 2, 2022
  • Sell More of What Your Company Does with the Resources You Already Have (External Constraint) – A Systemic Approach Part 16 November 3, 2022
  • The Science of Thinking Breakthroughs from Dr. Domenico Lepore for Today’s Complex Business Environment October 10, 2022
  • Shifting Your Focus from Cost to Throughput is How You Can Thrive – a Systemic Approach Part 15 September 29, 2022
  • Are Companies with a Hierarchical/Functional Mindset Dinosaurs? A Systemic Approach Part 14 September 22, 2022
  • Company Functions Are Limiting Your Organization’s Performance – A Systemic Approach Part 13 September 13, 2022
  • End Silos and Dissatisfaction: Learn to Operate as a Network of Projects Organization August 29, 2022
  • Leading and Managing Change Effectively: It’s A Process that Includes You – A Systemic Approach Part 11 August 21, 2022
  • Controlling the Whole Organization through the Constraint – A Systemic Approach Part 10 August 14, 2022
  • Improving Flow Company Wide – A Systemic Approach Part 9 August 3, 2022
  • Why Your Organization’s Constraints are the Key to Success – A Systemic Approach Part 8 July 29, 2022
  • Working with Variation to Support Good Decision Making – A Systemic Approach Part 7 July 20, 2022

Social Icons

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo

Archives

  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Our Blog

  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18
  • Why HR  Is So Much More than a Department – A Systemic Approach Part 17
  • Are Your Management Methods and Style Obsolete?
  • Sell More of What Your Company Does with the Resources You Already Have (External Constraint) – A Systemic Approach Part 16

Recent Posts

  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization January 20, 2023
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18 January 11, 2023
  • Why HR Is So Much More than a Department – A Systemic Approach Part 17 December 21, 2022
  • Are Your Management Methods and Style Obsolete? December 2, 2022
  • Sell More of What Your Company Does with the Resources You Already Have (External Constraint) – A Systemic Approach Part 16 November 3, 2022

Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.
  • Home
  • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
  • Library
  • How to adopt systemic organization management
  • Knowledge Base for ‘The Human Constraint’
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Intelligent Management Inc. Canada

Privacy Policy