This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Intelligent Management

Deming and Theory of Constraints for CEOs and Executive Teams for the Age of Complexity. Ess3ntial Critical Chain Project Management

  • THE DECALOGUE METHOD
    • The Problem for Every Business
    • The Systemic Solution
    • synchronize competencies
    • How It Works
    • business insight and foresight through systemic cause and effect reasoning
    • Our Education Modules for Systemic Management
  • about us
    • the founders
    • Dr. Domenico Lepore
    • Intelligent Management Success Stories
    • Our Books
    • Clients
    • Expanding Spiral of Positive Systemic Results with Intelligent Management
  • blog & books
    • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
    • Our publications
  • ITALIA
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Systems Thinking / Management and Control: a New Perspective

Dec 09 2012

Management and Control: a New Perspective

The traditional model for control is the hierarchical model, and the reason for its existence is because personal capacity for control is limited, and adding hierarchical levels increases personal capacity of control. On the other hand, if we want to increase the capacity to listen to the customers and the suppliers, in order to satisfy the needs of the market, we should not adopt a hierarchical model. What is the solution to this conflict?

Hierarchy or non-hierarchy?

How can managers exert control effectively? There is an inherent conflict underpinning the problem of control. The traditional model for control is the hierarchical model, and the reason for its existence is because personal capacity for control is limited, and adding hierarchical levels increase personal capacity of control. On the other hand, if we want to increase the capacity to listen to the customers and the suppliers, so to satisfy the needs of the market, we should not adopt a hierarchical model.

An alternative model

The model we propose, instead, is “the enterprise as a system”, a direct reference to Dr. Deming’s model of “production viewed as a system”:

Deming: Production viewed as a system

      The adoption of this model automatically includes in the picture customers, suppliers, and interdependencies, which are completely absent in the hierarchical model. But this approach alone is not enough to manage an organization effectively. The capacity of a system/network of interdependent components to achieve its goal is limited by a very small number of factors, indeed often only one: the constraint.

The constraint as focus and leverage point

Whether you are aware of it or not, every system has a constraint. The constraint is what determines the pace/speed at with which a system generates units of its goal. In for-profit companies the units of the goal are linked to the generation of cash profit (value).

A system that is balanced, i.e. where local efficiencies are pursued everywhere, is highly costly.  A system that is instead unbalanced around its constraint is like a tube with one section that is narrower than the rest: there is one phase/process/group of resources with less capacity than all the others.

Why do we manage a system through its constraint? It is because an unbalanced system is simpler and cheaper to manage. In an unbalanced system everything revolves around the constraint phase, and a detailed plan is necessary for this phase only. This schedule allows us to manage the whole plant. Reducing (global) variation in an unbalanced system means concentrating on and investing in the constraint phase only, not every single part of the process.

If we have to manage a plant, then increasing the productivity or improving its performance is considerably cheaper, and less wasteful in terms of time and energy, if it is unbalanced around the constraint. This knowledge is the legacy of Dr. Eli Goldratt, creator of the Theory of Constraints.

The benefit of an unbalanced system

Markets that are stable and repetitive over time, both regarding quantity and product mix, are not very common. That is why following the variation in demand is very difficult. By unbalancing the system around its constraint, we can achieve a flexibility that is much more manageable because the problem of sizing capacity (and making any changes) only concerns the constraint and not every phase of the process.

The algorithm we use to manage production through its constraint is Drum Buffer Rope (DBR). Lead times in plants managed using DBR tend to get close to the time it takes to technically complete the process. This is made possible by eliminating almost completely queues and piles of inventory. Obviously, this short and controllable lead time can become a considerable competitive advantage.

The mechanism to manage a ‘physical’ constraint is, as we said, DBR. The three steps of managing the constraint are:

  • Identify
  • Exploit
  • Subordinate

Identifying the constraint

Identification is relatively simple, since we can very quickly identify the machine, or the process, that limits the capacity of the system. However, considerations about capacity are necessary but not sufficient to identify the constraint. Indeed, in a real plant the product-market demand mix will vary over time and influence the capacity required by the various work centres. It is crucial that, once it has been chosen, the constraint remain the same over time, even when there is an increase in production capacity (“unbalanced” increase). That is why strategic considerations come into play in the identification of the constraint.

The constraint must be chosen bearing in mind that it is the element that determines the speed of cash generation for the whole organization. The main criteria include:

  • Assessment of future strategies and scenarios in the market
  • Comparative analysis of machines and resources (technical characteristics of the machines, skills of resources, interchangeability)
  • Assessment of the investment required and ways of increasing constraint capacity

In our next post we will look at how, on a practical basis, we subordinate the system to the constraint to maximize throughput.

For further information on Intelligent Management’s approach to systemic management see our website www.intelligentmanagement.ws and our latest book ‘Sechel: Logic, Language and Tools to Manage Any Organization as a Network.

Written by angela montgomery · Categorized: Systems Thinking · Tagged: cause and effect, change, complexity, Comstock Mining Inc., conflict, conflict cloud, conflict resolution, constraint, core conflict cloud, critical chain, Deming, digital cowboys, Domenico Lepore, economics, education, entropy, fear, future reality tree, Goldratt, hierarchy, human resources, information system, innovation, intelligence, Intelligent Management, interdependencies, leadership, learning, Lepore, Management Training, meaningful, mining, negative branch reservation, network, Network Theory, new economcis, new economics, organization, organizational design, physics, post-digitial, Prerequisite Tree, process, project, project management, Quality, statistical process control, sustainability, synchronization, Systems Thinking, theory of constraints, Thinking Process Tools, transformation, Transition Tree, variation

Search Form

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.

Search Form

Recent Posts

  • Radically Improving Organizational Performance – a Systemic Approach May 18, 2022
  • How to Put an End to Meaningless Meetings: an Operational Process May 5, 2022
  • Time for a Project Management Revolution – PMI Interviews Domenico Lepore April 22, 2022
  • Don’t Get Stuck on the Path to Change – Leverage Your Human Constraint April 17, 2022
  • The Transformational Method Behind an Economic Miracle We Can All Apply April 1, 2022
  • Goldman Sachs is WRONG About Managing Remote Work March 24, 2022
  • Systemic Leaders Who Get the Big Picture – Here’s How March 16, 2022
  • Peace Is a Mindset and a Thought Process March 3, 2022
  • Domenico Lepore on Deming and Goldratt and a Better Way Ahead February 25, 2022
  • Business Performance Metrics Every Entrepreneur Needs February 18, 2022
  • Get Your Focus Back with an Antidote to Distraction – a Systems Approach February 10, 2022
  • Organize, Control, Compete: Building Sustainable Growth for Businesses February 3, 2022
  • The Biggest Bottleneck for Business Today is Management January 28, 2022
  • 20 Leadership Takeaways for Today’s Scenario (Part Two) January 21, 2022
  • The Success of a Global CEO: 20 Leadership Takeaway Points from the Philips Journey January 13, 2022

Social Icons

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Our Blog

  • Radically Improving Organizational Performance – a Systemic Approach
  • How to Put an End to Meaningless Meetings: an Operational Process
  • Time for a Project Management Revolution – PMI Interviews Domenico Lepore
  • Don’t Get Stuck on the Path to Change – Leverage Your Human Constraint
  • The Transformational Method Behind an Economic Miracle We Can All Apply

Recent Posts

  • Radically Improving Organizational Performance – a Systemic Approach May 18, 2022
  • How to Put an End to Meaningless Meetings: an Operational Process May 5, 2022
  • Time for a Project Management Revolution – PMI Interviews Domenico Lepore April 22, 2022
  • Don’t Get Stuck on the Path to Change – Leverage Your Human Constraint April 17, 2022
  • The Transformational Method Behind an Economic Miracle We Can All Apply April 1, 2022

Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.
  • Home
  • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
  • Library
  • How to adopt systemic organization management
  • Knowledge Base for ‘The Human Constraint’
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Intelligent Management Inc. Canada

Privacy Policy