This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Intelligent Management

Deming and Theory of Constraints for CEOs and Executive Teams for the Age of Complexity. Ess3ntial Critical Chain Project Management

  • THE DECALOGUE METHOD
    • The Problem for Every Business
    • The Systemic Solution
    • synchronize competencies
    • How It Works
    • business insight and foresight through systemic cause and effect reasoning
    • Our Education Modules for Systemic Management
  • about us
    • Dr. Domenico Lepore
    • the founders
    • Intelligent Management Success Stories
    • Our Books
    • Clients
    • Expanding Spiral of Positive Systemic Results with Intelligent Management
  • blog & books
    • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
    • Our publications
  • ITALIA
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Systems Thinking / Innovation & Education: The School of Evolution

Nov 24 2011

Innovation & Education: The School of Evolution

School of EvolutionThis post is by Prof. Sergio Pagano, a member of the Intelligent Management team and an educator. He teaches physics at the University of Salerno, Italy, and has spent twenty years doing scientific research on superconductive electronics, macroscopic quantum coherence and nonlinear physics, so he is also concerned with innovation in science.

Current Conflict in Education

At Intelligent Management, we are accustomed to framing problems in the form of a conflict, as in keeping with the Theory of Constraints. There is a fundamental conflict in education today, and we may verbalize it as follows:

Standardize knowledge so it may be delivered, processed and tested

Vs

Keep up with the changes in expertise required to be competitive today

To examine this conflict, we need to step back first and look at where our education models come from.

The School of Evolution

Education is not just a fundamental part of our life, it is a fundamental part of our evolution. We can define Education as the transmission of our accumulated knowledge from one generation to the next, and it is what distinguishes us from our ancestors. Some 50,000 years ago, small groups of homo sapiens were scattered around the Earth, using almost all of their short lives to hunt for food and avoid being eaten. Their bodies and their brains were physically identical to ours. The major difference between one of them and the average modern citizen is the amount of knowledge transferred since birth through our social system, primarily the family and the school.

For this reason, finding the best way to transfer the accumulated knowledge of last 10,000 years of civilization to new generations should be THE major effort of our society. Indeed, this process is neither simple nor linear. We tend to forget many lessons from the past and invent, or sometimes reinvent, new concepts. Generally, at least in the scientific world, we all agree that we have witnessed a phenomenal increase in the body of knowledge, and as a consequence our quality of life has greatly improved.

In the last couple of centuries in particular, our life style has greatly changed. Our expectations, with respect to life duration, leisure time, good food, etc. are higher than those of kings from past centuries. Most of these changes are due to the wealth created by the introduction of new technologies, such as the steam engine, electricity, plastic, electronics, genomics. These new technologies are in turn derived from innovations generated by the new knowledge being developed.

Our present lifestyle, therefore, depends on technologies that stem from innovations generated by knowledge. However, new technologies and innovations have themselves changed the way new knowledge is generated and transferred, i.e. education in its broadest sense.

New Knowledge, Worse Students?

Caught in between education and innovation are the main characters of this whole story: the new generations of students. It is a commonplace amongst educators, at least where I live, that today’s students are not as committed and interested as we were a few decades ago. Both at secondary school and university level, these students appear to be less interested in studying and in planning their future. As with all generalizations, there is some truth to this.

We normally attribute this ‘less engaged’ behavior to the easier life of our young generation. I believe this is a misjudgement. The essence of the problem is that the world is changing, and we can no longer use old rules and standards to judge new generations.

We will look at why this is the case in our next post.

Related posts:

Educating for Complexity: How Do We Transform Schools into Centres of Innovation?

Reality is Not Made Up of Cycles but Complexity: Education and Innovation Pt. 2

Looking at the Core Conflict in Education and Innovation Today (Pt. 3)

Written by angela montgomery · Categorized: Systems Thinking · Tagged: education, evolution, innovation, school, Science, technology, theory of constraints

Search Form

Comments

  1. Shankar Rao says

    November 27, 2011 at 2:10 AM

    I find the conflict needs some clarification
    standardisation means classification of knowledge into validated bits of known behaviour and characretistics of enitieies and their relationships.
    Updating or keeping up with changes means invalidating the invalid bits of standardised knowledge or adding new bits of new knowedge to the stradardised validated items
    Starting with the principle that all knowledge is based on valiated facts and assumptions about the the unvalidated ones where is the conflict?

    To my mind the carry forward of invalid knowledege and our inability to give up the illogical is a bigger issue to really worry about.

    The world vision 50000 years back is an assumption.
    If their brains and faculties were the same as ours then their capabilities too should have been similar and they too shaould have made dramatic improvements in learning in a period of 200 years .

    the ups and downs of a 100 years is too small a blip in the ageless history of the earth and life on earth

    If students dont have interest in learning then there must be a deeper reason related to the values that are attributed to learning and their perception of the value of learning.

    Life styles are also related to the core values the society promotes and accepts and these core values drive the consequential changes in society.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.

Search Form

Recent Posts

  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization January 20, 2023
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18 January 11, 2023
  • Why HR Is So Much More than a Department – A Systemic Approach Part 17 December 21, 2022
  • Are Your Management Methods and Style Obsolete? December 2, 2022
  • Sell More of What Your Company Does with the Resources You Already Have (External Constraint) – A Systemic Approach Part 16 November 3, 2022
  • The Science of Thinking Breakthroughs from Dr. Domenico Lepore for Today’s Complex Business Environment October 10, 2022
  • Shifting Your Focus from Cost to Throughput is How You Can Thrive – a Systemic Approach Part 15 September 29, 2022
  • Are Companies with a Hierarchical/Functional Mindset Dinosaurs? A Systemic Approach Part 14 September 22, 2022
  • Company Functions Are Limiting Your Organization’s Performance – A Systemic Approach Part 13 September 13, 2022
  • End Silos and Dissatisfaction: Learn to Operate as a Network of Projects Organization August 29, 2022
  • Leading and Managing Change Effectively: It’s A Process that Includes You – A Systemic Approach Part 11 August 21, 2022
  • Controlling the Whole Organization through the Constraint – A Systemic Approach Part 10 August 14, 2022
  • Improving Flow Company Wide – A Systemic Approach Part 9 August 3, 2022
  • Why Your Organization’s Constraints are the Key to Success – A Systemic Approach Part 8 July 29, 2022
  • Working with Variation to Support Good Decision Making – A Systemic Approach Part 7 July 20, 2022

Social Icons

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo

Archives

  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Our Blog

  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18
  • Why HR  Is So Much More than a Department – A Systemic Approach Part 17
  • Are Your Management Methods and Style Obsolete?
  • Sell More of What Your Company Does with the Resources You Already Have (External Constraint) – A Systemic Approach Part 16

Recent Posts

  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization January 20, 2023
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18 January 11, 2023
  • Why HR Is So Much More than a Department – A Systemic Approach Part 17 December 21, 2022
  • Are Your Management Methods and Style Obsolete? December 2, 2022
  • Sell More of What Your Company Does with the Resources You Already Have (External Constraint) – A Systemic Approach Part 16 November 3, 2022

Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.
  • Home
  • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
  • Library
  • How to adopt systemic organization management
  • Knowledge Base for ‘The Human Constraint’
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Intelligent Management Inc. Canada

Privacy Policy