This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Intelligent Management

Deming and Theory of Constraints for CEOs and Executive Teams for the Age of Complexity. Ess3ntial Critical Chain Project Management

  • THE DECALOGUE METHOD
    • The Problem for Every Business
    • The Systemic Solution
    • synchronize competencies
    • How It Works
    • business insight and foresight through systemic cause and effect reasoning
    • Our Education Modules for Systemic Management
  • about us
    • Dr. Domenico Lepore
    • the founders
    • Intelligent Management Success Stories
    • Our Books
    • Clients
    • Expanding Spiral of Positive Systemic Results with Intelligent Management
  • blog & books
    • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
    • Our publications
  • ITALIA
  • Contact
You are here: Home / project management / How Organizations Can Improve Work-life Balance Right Now

Feb 02 2017

How Organizations Can Improve Work-life Balance Right Now

Screen Shot 2017-02-02 at 9.43.09 AM

Work-life balance is defined by some as prioritizing between work (career and ambition) and lifestyle (health, pleasure, family and spiritual development). There is an immediate problem with this definition as it compartmentalizes people’s lives in a, frankly, unrealistic and undesirable way. It suggests that people leave their authentic selves at home, like a coat, when they go to work. That’s a very uncomfortable split to be living in for so many of our waking hours. But there is so much that organizations can do to heal the rift.

You wouldn’t like me when I’m me

Why would people think that their work is something separate from their real selves? Because the work is organized in such a way that it feels alien to them. They don’t recognize themselves, with their personal talents, ambitions and values, as reflected in the work they do. However, if organizations learn to structure their work in a way that is more satisfying for employees it is a win-win situation. Not only do they have more satisfied people in the workplace, they can also tap into the energy those people bring as a result of that satisfaction.

Meaningful work

The greatest thing an organization can do for the work-life balance of its people is to allow them to do meaningful work. As long as the organization is not asking them to do things that are unethical or harmful, there is no reason why an employee shouldn’t be willing to contribute fully to the overall goal. One of the most alienating things an organization can do is adopt a command and control structure where work and careers are artificially confined to silos and ‘climbing the ladder’. Humans have evolved beyond the stage where people have to be structured in a pyramid to get things done.

Pyramids are the enemy number one of satisfying work because the prevailing logic for doing things is not based on achieving a common goal. Each compartment (boss, department, function etc.) is striving to achieve the maximum for their own piece of turf. As an inevitable result, in order to do their job employees are asked to perform tasks that don’t make sense and waste time. In an increasingly digital world, much of what people need to do could be done from home and in flexible hours that would allow them to manage their family lives with a lot less stress. But this rarely happens because managers think they can’t “control” people properly. So employees are highly likely to think of their own life as elsewhere and their working life as something to be endured.

An organization structured for humans

It doesn’t have to be like this. People will feel more satisfaction and involvement when leadership:

  • stops wasting peoples time in pointless meetings
  • stops making them do stupid things
  • let’s them also work from home and with flexible hours
  • doesn’t ask them to do things that are bad for the environment or other people

How can this be achieved? An organization needs to be structured optimally to achieve its goal. First of all, the goal has to be very clear (this is not a mission statement). The processes that lead to achieving the goal need to be fully mapped out. The actions that lead to the daily achievement and special initiatives to achieve the goal need to be scheduled into projects based on finite capacity (real resources that are actually available). Only a percentage of people’s total hours need to be actually scheduled.

When an organization is structured in this way, as a network of projects, it is designed in a way that reflects how work is actually done, without the artificial barriers and frustrations of functional silos. This speeds up and optimizes the flow of work  in all areas. It becomes very clear who is needed to do what and when and this reveals how much work can be done off-site and in “out-of-office” hours. Control is not exercised through a vertical hierarchy but through calling on resources to contribute through clearly-identified and synchronized tasks.

When an organization understands that is not isolated but part of an entire value network, then it can consider responsibly the impact of what it does on the network as a whole. Adopting a systemic approach to management means connecting the dots and seeing how the big picture affects all of those involved, for better or worse. Being profitable and working towards the common good are not a contradiction. On the contrary, the more interdependent we are with others (and this is happening faster and faster) the more it makes sense to cooperate.

Forget the gimmicks

It’s not about casual Fridays or toys in the office. It’s about designing work in a way that allows people to contribute with their whole selves.

Just giving people the possibility to contribute their best without creating harm would make a huge difference.

 Sign up to our blog here and shift your thinking towards broader, systemic possibilities for yourself and your organization.

About the Author

Angela Montgomery Ph.D. is Partner and Co-founder of Intelligent Management and author of the business novel+ website  The Human Constraint . This downloadable novel uses narrative to look at how the Deming approach and the Theory of Constraints can create the organization of the future, based on collaboration, network and social innovation.  She is co-author with Dr. Domenico Lepore, founder, and Dr. Giovanni Siepe of  ‘Quality, Involvement, Flow: The Systemic Organization’  from CRC Press, New York.

Written by angela montgomery · Categorized: project management, Systems Thinking, systems view of the world, Theory of Constraints · Tagged: ethics, Meetings, network of project, work-life balance

Search Form

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.

Search Form

Recent Posts

  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization January 20, 2023
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18 January 11, 2023
  • Why HR Is So Much More than a Department – A Systemic Approach Part 17 December 21, 2022
  • Are Your Management Methods and Style Obsolete? December 2, 2022
  • Sell More of What Your Company Does with the Resources You Already Have (External Constraint) – A Systemic Approach Part 16 November 3, 2022
  • The Science of Thinking Breakthroughs from Dr. Domenico Lepore for Today’s Complex Business Environment October 10, 2022
  • Shifting Your Focus from Cost to Throughput is How You Can Thrive – a Systemic Approach Part 15 September 29, 2022
  • Are Companies with a Hierarchical/Functional Mindset Dinosaurs? A Systemic Approach Part 14 September 22, 2022
  • Company Functions Are Limiting Your Organization’s Performance – A Systemic Approach Part 13 September 13, 2022
  • End Silos and Dissatisfaction: Learn to Operate as a Network of Projects Organization August 29, 2022
  • Leading and Managing Change Effectively: It’s A Process that Includes You – A Systemic Approach Part 11 August 21, 2022
  • Controlling the Whole Organization through the Constraint – A Systemic Approach Part 10 August 14, 2022
  • Improving Flow Company Wide – A Systemic Approach Part 9 August 3, 2022
  • Why Your Organization’s Constraints are the Key to Success – A Systemic Approach Part 8 July 29, 2022
  • Working with Variation to Support Good Decision Making – A Systemic Approach Part 7 July 20, 2022

Social Icons

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo

Archives

  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Our Blog

  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18
  • Why HR  Is So Much More than a Department – A Systemic Approach Part 17
  • Are Your Management Methods and Style Obsolete?
  • Sell More of What Your Company Does with the Resources You Already Have (External Constraint) – A Systemic Approach Part 16

Recent Posts

  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization January 20, 2023
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18 January 11, 2023
  • Why HR Is So Much More than a Department – A Systemic Approach Part 17 December 21, 2022
  • Are Your Management Methods and Style Obsolete? December 2, 2022
  • Sell More of What Your Company Does with the Resources You Already Have (External Constraint) – A Systemic Approach Part 16 November 3, 2022

Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.
  • Home
  • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
  • Library
  • How to adopt systemic organization management
  • Knowledge Base for ‘The Human Constraint’
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Intelligent Management Inc. Canada

Privacy Policy