This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Intelligent Management

Deming and Theory of Constraints for CEOs and Executive Teams for the Age of Complexity. Ess3ntial Critical Chain Project Management

  • Home
  • about us
    • the founders
    • Dr. Domenico Lepore
    • Intelligent Management Success Stories
    • Our Books
    • Clients
    • Expanding Spiral of Positive Systemic Results with Intelligent Management
  • Decalogue Methodology
    • Decalogue Methodology for Whole System Management
      • How to adopt systemic organization management
    • Management Must Evolve Fast – 15 Days to Radically Improve Company Performance
    • 10 Steps for Transformation
    • Systemic Organization Management
    • Resource Library for Systemic Management
    • Our Education Modules for Systemic Management
  • Contact
  • Our Whole System Blog
  • Intelligent Management Italia
You are here: Home / project management / How to Do New Product Development Seamlessly with a Systems Approach

Aug 02 2019

How to Do New Product Development Seamlessly with a Systems Approach

Any organization that wishes to innovate must be able to develop new products. The ability to develop new ideas, and new products in particular, can be stimulated and increased systemically by addressing the “cognitive limits” of the organization using the Thinking Processes from the Theory of Constraints. The capacity to continuously innovate has become a necessity today and it can be learned. This is certainly the first step in New Product Development.

Sometimes, however, the problem is not a lack of ability to develop new ideas or products, but the ability to design and execute a precise plan and to manage a project, whether simple or complex.

There are two key  aspects here:

  • the speed with which we develop an innovation or new product
  • actual project management

In the Decalogue approach, we make recurrent use of W. Edward Deming’s PDSA cycle. This consists of four phases, the first of which is PLAN, the second is DO, the third is STUDY and the fourth is ACT. It is essentially a way of applying the scientific method to how we operate.

When a change or a new product is planned, this phase represents the beginning of the entire cycle.

What normally happens is that, due to our excitement about the new idea and eagerness to achieve the goal, we dedicate little time to detailed planning and we try and show immediately that we can get results. We try and skip the planning phase.

However, to have success with a new product we have two needs we must not ignore:

  • Speed in the execution phase
  • Time dedicated to planning phase

Intelligent Management uses a very precise method to plan projects based on the Critical Chain algorithm.

Thinking New Product Development through

Making use of the Thinking Processes in designing and rolling out a new product is fundamental. Let’s see how.

Once we have correctly verbalized the goal, we can list the obstacles that stand between us in our current reality and achieving the goal in the future. We then transform this set of obstacles into a set of macro actions, one for each obstacle, that allow us to overcome the obstacle. These macro actions are called “intermediate objectives”.

These intermediate objectives are not all equal, in that they cannot all be carried out at the same time. When they are correctly sequenced they become a network of macro actions that in the Theory of Constraints is called a Prerequisite Tree (PRT).

However, we are still not ready to schedule a project.

The intermediate objectives are still too onerous, and the next step is to break them down into 3-4 simple actions that will allow us to achieve them. These actions are then placed into a logical sequence using a network of cause and effect actions to verify their completeness. This network is called a Transition Tree (TRT).

Now we are ready to schedule a project. We assign a reasonable duration to each action from the various TRTs, and this duration must be realistic and not in any way ‘buffered’. We make a precise list of the resources available in the organization, grouped according to skills, and assign the resources necessary so each action can be completed, considering the resource to be completely dedicated to a specific task for the specific duration (no multi-tasking). At this point we solve any contention of resources.

Now we have a sequence of actions, some of which are prerequisites of others, that make up the various chains. The longest chain of interdependent actions, taking into consideration the sharing of resources (finite capacity), becomes the Critical Chain. This is the constraint of the project. It is the factor that determines how the project  comes in on time and within budget.

A project is a system

But how do we manage a project? How can we check that everything is being carried out correctly?

First of all, we do not use milestones. In other words, we do not consider the completion of single tasks as significant. Often, the completion of a single task is emphasized positively, while the overall project is behind schedule. Even if 95% of a project is completed, it is still a failure. Projects have to be 100% complete to be successful. Single tasks are necessary because they are part of the project, and in this sense a project is a system.

Last but not least, we have to take into account variation. Variation exists and influences every task and this impacts the project and its completion.  The way we deal with this fact of nature is not to protect the individual tasks with fake buffers that only serve to guarantee that a resource completes their task in time. The only protection we must guarantee is to the constraint. The correct action, therefore, is to buffer the Critical Chain (normally about 20% of the length of the total project), and then monitor the buffer’s consumption (buffer management) using Statistical Process Control. Therefore, applying SPC is crucial to our understanding of how the project is progressing.

Intelligent Management uses a proprietary software called ‘Ess3ntial’ for finite capacity scheduling of projects that uniquely applies SPC to monitor the behaviour of the buffer. The main feature of Ess3ntial is that it enables the scheduling of the competencies that each resource possesses, in this way allowing optimal use of all the talents available in the organization.

DR. DOMENICO LEPORE’S NEW BOOK AVAILABLE NOW!
Leaders and managers are facing unprecedented change in the Digital Age. To compete they must shift to a systemic mindset and way of conducting operations. We work alongside CEOs and Executive Teams to support the shift towards more effective, systemic strategy and operations. Our books include ‘Deming and Goldratt: The Decalogue‘, ‘Sechel: Logic, Language and Tools to Manage Any Organization as a Network’, ‘The Human Constraint‘, ‘Quality, Involvement and Flow: The Systemic Organization’ , and now ‘Moving the Chains: An Operational Solution to Embrace Complexity in the Digital Age‘ .We support our international clients through education, training and the Ess3ntial multi-project software using Critical Chain to schedule competencies and unlock the potential of human resources. Based on our proprietary Decalogue methodology.

 

Written by angela montgomery · Categorized: project management, Systems Thinking, systems view of the world · Tagged: critical chain, new product development, Thinking Processes

Search Form

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign up for our Blog and receive our White Paper ‘Out of the Crisis – A New Kind of Science for Management’

Sign up for our blog here to receive all our blog posts by e-mail.

Search Form

Recent Posts

  • Why Is Managing Change So Hard and How Can We Make it Easier? February 25, 2021
  • Creating Connections Between Company Functions – Back to Deming February 19, 2021
  • Human Resources – a New Perspective for Our Post-Pandemic World February 10, 2021
  • What’s Driving Profitability in Your Business and What Isn’t – How to Find Out February 3, 2021
  • Business, Politics, Wall Street: the Learning Organization and Our Interconnected Future January 29, 2021
  • What Does it Take to Be a Leader in Today’s Complex World? January 21, 2021
  • A New Economics for Sustainable Prosperity – Out of the Crisis Series Part 7 January 13, 2021
  • Identifying Assumptions to Unlock Innovation and Move Beyond the Crisis – Out of the Crisis Series Part 6 January 6, 2021
  • Learning to Think Systemically to Make Informed Decisions and Pre-empt a Crisis – Out of the Crisis Part 5 December 30, 2020
  • How to Manage Decentralized Work – Out of the Crisis Series Part 4 December 23, 2020
  • Vital Insights from Managing Variation and Constraints – Out of the Crisis Series Part 3 December 16, 2020
  • What’s Wrong with Organizational Structure – Out of the Crisis Series Part 2 December 9, 2020
  • A Serious Knowledge Gap Affecting Leaders and Executives – Out of the Crisis Series Part 1 December 2, 2020
  • How to Prevent Chaos in Any Project or Initiative November 26, 2020
  • The Words We Use Can Change Our Reality – Shifting to a Systems View November 20, 2020

Social Icons

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Archives

  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Recent Posts

  • Why Is Managing Change So Hard and How Can We Make it Easier? February 25, 2021
  • Creating Connections Between Company Functions – Back to Deming February 19, 2021
  • Human Resources – a New Perspective for Our Post-Pandemic World February 10, 2021
  • What’s Driving Profitability in Your Business and What Isn’t – How to Find Out February 3, 2021
  • Business, Politics, Wall Street: the Learning Organization and Our Interconnected Future January 29, 2021

Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Sign up for our blog

  • Home
  • Blog Theory of Constraints & Deming
  • Library
  • How to adopt systemic organization management
  • Knowledge Base for ‘The Human Constraint’
  • Contact Us

© 2020 Intelligent Management Inc. Canada

Privacy Policy