This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Intelligent Management

Deming and Theory of Constraints for CEOs and Executive Teams for the Age of Complexity. Ess3ntial Critical Chain Project Management

  • THE DECALOGUE METHOD
    • The Problem for Every Business
    • The Systemic Solution
    • synchronize competencies
    • How It Works
    • business insight and foresight through systemic cause and effect reasoning
    • Our Education Modules for Systemic Management
  • about us
    • the founders
    • Dr. Domenico Lepore
    • Intelligent Management Success Stories
    • Our Books
    • Clients
    • Expanding Spiral of Positive Systemic Results with Intelligent Management
  • blog & books
    • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
    • Our publications
  • ITALIA
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Systems Thinking / Why Your Functional Hierarchy Is Stifling Your Results

Feb 05 2020

Why Your Functional Hierarchy Is Stifling Your Results

We’re in week two of the course we were invited by the University of Venice to design and deliver for businesses so they can manage complexity. To survive and thrive in our new reality dominated by complexity, companies need to adopt a systemic perspective and a systemic way of operating. So it was satisfying to see this week that the World Economic Forum published an article with the title Why the World Needs Systems Leaders Not Selfish Leadership 

Changing how we think to manage complexity

When we hit a billiard ball we know what will happen next. It’s a predictable trajectory. Even just 50 years ago our reality was simpler in many ways and it was easier to think of things in terms of predictable trajectories. University degrees would guarantee a better paid job and a career. It was not unusual for companies to hire employees and keep them for decades. Organizations could be managed as top-down hierarchies because nobody expected anything different. Company life followed a line of linear thinking where the future would be an extension of the past and present. This kind of thinking is well reflected in the use of Excel spreadsheets, where data fits neatly into boxes and any kind of “forecast” can simply be extrapolated from that data.

Living with complexity, instead, as we do today, means living with a continuous increase in interdependencies. These interdependencies generate dynamics that are not linear. They give rise to emergent properties that are something distinct form the components they emerge from and they create networks of conversations.

The problem arises when people try and operate using linear thinking within our contemporary reality. If we attempt to tackle complexity with a linear mindset, we inevitably try to “break it down into its parts” in an attempt to understand it, the way you would take apart a piece of machinery to see how it works. This is a “mechanistic” way of understanding reality and there is a reason why people attempt it. They have a need to understand the components.

What has complexity got to do with hierarchy?

We can spot a mechanistic mindset behind the traditional form of organization that operates with a functional hierarchy.

As far back as Moses, we encounter the idea of a hierarchy. Moses’ father-in-law Jethro saw that Moses was exhausting himself in trying to administer the law to all the people so he suggested that Moses “appoint leaders of thousands, leaders of hundreds, leaders of fifties and leaders of tens”. This hierarchy was based on competence. However, over the centuries, organizations have shaped themselves into functional hierarchies and this has led to the creation of silos.

Silos are responsible for much of the frustration and waste of energy that typify the way work is carried out in organizations today. The artificial barriers that silos create can only interrupt the natural flow of processes and efforts towards achieving the goal. Silos lead to levels of permissions and bureaucracy that inevitably inhibit results.

Mind your interdependencies

If every action that people carried out in their work had zero interaction with the work of others, then we would not have to worry about interdependencies. An example of this would be a bowling team. The goal is to win the game. In a straightforward, linear way, each bowler bowls to the best of their ability and the team scores points. Each bowler acts independently. The highest scoring team wins.

Now think of an orchestra. The goal is to perform a given piece of music to the highest standard the musicians are capable of. None of the musicians can act independently because in order to achieve the goal they all have to follow the same score and tempo. They have to interdepend. The orchestra model is much closer to how an organization needs to behave to achieve its goal in a complex world.

Achieving ten times more with what you have

Let’s make a bold statement here. Many companies could probably achieve ten times what they are achieving with the competencies they currently have available. So why don’t they?

Most people think that if they improve the performance of all the people and all the machines in their company then there will be an overall improvement. This is linear thinking and it is not true. The whole is NOT the sum of the parts.

If we take our thinking deeper, we can see that, whether or not they are conscious of it, most organizations are living through an inherent conflict that is preventing them from achieving what they are capable of with what they have. A conflict (in some cases a paradox) can be a systemic way of framing a problem or situation of blockage in order to find a breakthrough solution. We can use the Conflict Cloud, one of the systemic Thinking Processes from the Theory of Constraints to help us see the conflict affecting most organizations.

If our goal is to manage sustainable growth (A), then we will have a  legitimate need to exercise control over costs and the individual responsibilities of the members of the organization (B) and this need will lead us to want to adopt a hierarchical/functional organizational structure (D).

On the other hand,

if our goal is to manage sustainable growth (A), then we will have a  legitimate need to increase the cash generated by sales (C) and this need will lead us to want to NOT adopt a hierarchical/functional organizational structure (D).

So now we can see the conflict clearly and the legitimate needs that create the conflicting positions. The reason why this conflict exists in the first place is because we make a series of assumptions. We can call these assumptions mental models. Let’s verbalize the assumptions that are the “connective tissue” of the conflict.

What will allow us to break out of the “prison” of this conflict? First, we must verbalize the assumptions between D and D’.

When we verbalize the assumptions between D and D’ we will see that they can be challenged. By challenging them we pave the way to creating a systemic solution, or “Injection” as it is called in the Theory of Constraints. An  Injection is a statement that invalidates an assumption but it must also protect the legitimate needs in B and C. When companies address this conflict with a systemic solution, they can pave the way to achieving radically more with the competencies they have and they will provide an environment that is much more satisfying and rewarding for all of its employees.

SCHEDULE AN INTRODUCTORY CALL WITH US ‘

DR. DOMENICO LEPORE’S NEW BOOK AVAILABLE NOW!
Leaders and managers are facing unprecedented change in the Digital Age. To compete they must shift to a systemic mindset and way of conducting operations. We work alongside CEOs and Executive Teams to support the shift towards more effective, systemic strategy and operations. Our books include ‘Deming and Goldratt: The Decalogue‘, ‘Sechel: Logic, Language and Tools to Manage Any Organization as a Network’, ‘The Human Constraint‘, ‘Quality, Involvement and Flow: The Systemic Organization’ , and now ‘Moving the Chains: An Operational Solution to Embrace Complexity in the Digital Age‘ .We support our international clients through education, training and the Ess3ntial multi-project software using Critical Chain to schedule competencies and unlock the potential of human resources. Based on our proprietary Decalogue methodology.

 

 

 

Written by angela montgomery · Categorized: Systems Thinking, systems view of the world, Theory of Constraints · Tagged: complexity, functional hierarchy, inherent conflict, interdependencies

Search Form

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.

Search Form

Recent Posts

  • Improving Flow Company Wide – A Systemic Approach Part 9 August 3, 2022
  • Why Your Organization’s Constraints are the Key to Success – A Systemic Approach Part 8 July 29, 2022
  • Working with Variation to Support Good Decision Making – A Systemic Approach Part 7 July 20, 2022
  • Create Stability and Predictability in Your Organization by Understanding Variation – A Systemic Approach Part 6 July 9, 2022
  • Leadership for Complex Times – A Systemic Approach Part 5 July 3, 2022
  • How to Drastically Improve Company Results Through Healthy Interactions – A Systemic Approach Part 4 June 16, 2022
  • How to Make the Best Decisions for Your Company and Measure What Matters – A Systemic Approach Part 3 June 2, 2022
  • Interdependencies and Establishing the Goal of Your Organization – A Systemic Approach Part 2 May 26, 2022
  • Radically Improving Organizational Performance – a Systemic Approach May 18, 2022
  • How to Put an End to Meaningless Meetings: an Operational Process May 5, 2022
  • Time for a Project Management Revolution – PMI Interviews Domenico Lepore April 22, 2022
  • Don’t Get Stuck on the Path to Change – Leverage Your Human Constraint April 17, 2022
  • The Transformational Method Behind an Economic Miracle We Can All Apply April 1, 2022
  • Goldman Sachs is WRONG About Managing Remote Work March 24, 2022
  • Systemic Leaders Who Get the Big Picture – Here’s How March 16, 2022

Social Icons

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo

Archives

  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Our Blog

  • Improving Flow Company Wide – A Systemic Approach Part 9
  • Why Your Organization’s Constraints are the Key to Success – A Systemic Approach Part 8
  • Working with Variation to Support Good Decision Making – A Systemic Approach Part 7
  • Create Stability and Predictability in Your Organization by Understanding Variation – A Systemic Approach Part 6
  • Leadership for Complex Times – A Systemic Approach Part 5

Recent Posts

  • Improving Flow Company Wide – A Systemic Approach Part 9 August 3, 2022
  • Why Your Organization’s Constraints are the Key to Success – A Systemic Approach Part 8 July 29, 2022
  • Working with Variation to Support Good Decision Making – A Systemic Approach Part 7 July 20, 2022
  • Create Stability and Predictability in Your Organization by Understanding Variation – A Systemic Approach Part 6 July 9, 2022
  • Leadership for Complex Times – A Systemic Approach Part 5 July 3, 2022

Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.
  • Home
  • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
  • Library
  • How to adopt systemic organization management
  • Knowledge Base for ‘The Human Constraint’
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Intelligent Management Inc. Canada

Privacy Policy