This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Intelligent Management

Deming and Theory of Constraints for CEOs and Executive Teams for the Age of Complexity. Ess3ntial Critical Chain Project Management

  • THE DECALOGUE METHOD
    • The Problem for Every Business
    • The Systemic Solution
    • synchronize competencies
    • How It Works
    • business insight and foresight through systemic cause and effect reasoning
    • Our Education Modules for Systemic Management
  • about us
    • the founders
    • Dr. Domenico Lepore
    • Intelligent Management Success Stories
    • Our Books
    • Clients
    • Expanding Spiral of Positive Systemic Results with Intelligent Management
  • blog & books
    • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
    • Our publications
  • ITALIA
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Systems Thinking / Identifying Assumptions to Unlock Innovation and Move Beyond the Crisis – Out of the Crisis Series Part 6

Jan 06 2021

Identifying Assumptions to Unlock Innovation and Move Beyond the Crisis – Out of the Crisis Series Part 6

In the previous part of this series, Part 5: Learning to Think Systemically to Make Informed Decisions and Pre-empt a Crisis, we saw how the Conflict Cloud Thinking Process helps us identify a situation of blockage and understand why this blockage exists in the first place. What keeps us stuck is the set of assumptions, or mental models that connect the elements of the conflict together like a connective tissue and keep it alive. We can think of these assumptions in terms of latent thoughts that have never been verbalized but that exist and influence our behavior as an organization. Only by verbalizing these assumptions and “surfacing” them can we challenge them. Identifying and challenging our assumptions is the royal road to moving beyond a situation of blockage, or crisis to unlock innovation and emerge with a breakthrough, systemic solution. In the Theory of Constraints this kind of solution is called an “Injection”.

We framed the current situation of crisis using this Thinking Process and worked on this dilemma with a highly successful client, based on their current reality following the outbreak of Coronavirus. This allowed us to verbalize the conflict more specifically but in a way that is still relevant for the current reality of many organizations living through this crisis. We verbalized the need in B connected with control as “preserve existing customers/relationships” and this leads to wanting to take the conservative action of “subordinate the development of our innovative solutions to the current economic scenario”. The need in C connected with vision becomes “increase value generated by new solutions” and this prompts to wanting to take the expansive action of “leverage the existing economic scenario to boost development of our innovative solutions”. The goal common to the two needs is “Create sustainable development within the new scenario”.

So, what are the thoughts/assumptions/mental models that create this conflict in the first place? How can we verbalize them and then find a way forward? The grey and blue boxes contain the assumptions that connect the elements of the conflict together and keep it in existence.

 

This is how we read the cloud once we have built it:

If  our goal (A) is to create sustainable development within the new scenario and sustainability requires continuity of relations, then, (B) we must preserve existing customers/relationships, and if in a moment of crisis, our clients are often reluctant to consider new investments for innovation, then this prompts us to adopt the position (D) Subordinate the development of our innovative solutions to the current economic scenario.

On the other hand,

If our goal (A) is to Create sustainable development within the new scenario, and sustainability requires the ability to develop and capitalize on innovative solutions, then we must (C) increase value generated by new solutions. And if value generated by new solutions opens new economic possibilities that overcome the current scenario then this prompts us to adopt the position (D’) Leverage the existing economic scenario  to boost development of our innovative solutions. We find ourselves stuck in this dilemma because we make the assumptions between D and D’: the economic impact of an innovative solution is not something measurable; an innovative solution threatens current equilibrium/status quo; the way we work and manage our organization after the crisis must mirror what existed before.

The conflict, or situation of blockage, will continue to exist unless we challenge the assumptions. The assumptions between the two pink boxes, D and D’ that contain the conflicting positions, are the ones we want to “attack”. In this way we demonstrate to ourselves that what is keeping us stuck is neither true nor valid and we have an alternative: we can choose to change our reality. We start to do this by verbalizing statements (Injections) that invalidate the assumptions but protect the needs in B and C. This is how we create a systemic, sustainable way forward.

We have identified two injections that can help any organization step out of the blockage/paralysis that this conflict depicts. They are:

  1. We develop and manage the company as an oriented network of projects (constraint-based)
  2. We accelerate the development and introduction of innovation through execution of constraint-based projects

 

 

The conflict cloud allows us to bring the multi-faceted network of formal and informal conversations taking place around the issues at stake into a condensed, workable and visual format. The assumptions, especially the ones between D and D’ represent the set of mental models that allow the conflict to exist. They represent the “cognitive constraint” that limits our ability to overcome such a conflict. By exposing these mental models in a linguistically correct format, we can leverage them to propel the current situation of reality towards one that is more desirable.

Other articles in this ‘Out of the Crisis’ series:

Part 1: A Serious Knowledge Gap Affecting Leaders and Executives

Part 2: What’s Wrong with Organizational Structures?

Part 3: Viral Insights from Managing Variation and Constraints

Part 4: How to Manage Decentralized Work

Part 5: Learning to Think Systemically to Make Informed Decisions and Pre-empt a Crisis

Contact: intelligentmanagement@sechel.ws
SCHEDULE AN INTRODUCTORY CALL WITH US

Intelligent Management has been guiding organizations to understand a systemic approach to managing complexity for over 20 years through our Decalogue management methodology. The Network of Projects organization design we developed is supported  by our Ess3ntial software for multi-project finite scheduling using the Critical Chain algorithm. 
We can learn to think systemically, see the big picture and connect the dots that otherwise we would not even see. Our business novel, ‘The Human Constraint’ , bought in 41 countries, presents several case histories through narrative form and illustrates that it is the way we think that we have to transform. That is the biggest challenge now. 

LEARN MORE

DR. DOMENICO LEPORE’S BOOK IS AVAILABLE NOW!
Leaders and managers are facing unprecedented change in the Digital Age. To compete they must shift to a systemic mindset and way of conducting operations.

Written by angela montgomery · Categorized: Systems Thinking, systems view of the world · Tagged: assumptions, injection, innovation, out of the crisis conflict, out of the crisis series

Search Form

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.

Search Form

Recent Posts

  • How to Drastically Improve Company Results Through Healthy Interactions June 16, 2022
  • How to Make the Best Decisions for Your Company and Measure What Matters June 2, 2022
  • Interdependencies and Establishing the Goal of Your Organization – A Systemic Approach Part 2 May 26, 2022
  • Radically Improving Organizational Performance – a Systemic Approach May 18, 2022
  • How to Put an End to Meaningless Meetings: an Operational Process May 5, 2022
  • Time for a Project Management Revolution – PMI Interviews Domenico Lepore April 22, 2022
  • Don’t Get Stuck on the Path to Change – Leverage Your Human Constraint April 17, 2022
  • The Transformational Method Behind an Economic Miracle We Can All Apply April 1, 2022
  • Goldman Sachs is WRONG About Managing Remote Work March 24, 2022
  • Systemic Leaders Who Get the Big Picture – Here’s How March 16, 2022
  • Peace Is a Mindset and a Thought Process March 3, 2022
  • Domenico Lepore on Deming and Goldratt and a Better Way Ahead February 25, 2022
  • Business Performance Metrics Every Entrepreneur Needs February 18, 2022
  • Get Your Focus Back with an Antidote to Distraction – a Systems Approach February 10, 2022
  • Organize, Control, Compete: Building Sustainable Growth for Businesses February 3, 2022

Social Icons

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Our Blog

  • How to Drastically Improve Company Results Through Healthy Interactions
  • How to Make the Best Decisions for Your Company and Measure What Matters
  • Interdependencies and Establishing the Goal of Your Organization – A Systemic Approach Part 2
  • Radically Improving Organizational Performance – a Systemic Approach
  • How to Put an End to Meaningless Meetings: an Operational Process

Recent Posts

  • How to Drastically Improve Company Results Through Healthy Interactions June 16, 2022
  • How to Make the Best Decisions for Your Company and Measure What Matters June 2, 2022
  • Interdependencies and Establishing the Goal of Your Organization – A Systemic Approach Part 2 May 26, 2022
  • Radically Improving Organizational Performance – a Systemic Approach May 18, 2022
  • How to Put an End to Meaningless Meetings: an Operational Process May 5, 2022

Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.
  • Home
  • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
  • Library
  • How to adopt systemic organization management
  • Knowledge Base for ‘The Human Constraint’
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Intelligent Management Inc. Canada

Privacy Policy