This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Intelligent Management

Deming and Theory of Constraints for CEOs and Executive Teams for the Age of Complexity. Ess3ntial Critical Chain Project Management

  • Home
  • about us
    • the founders
    • Dr. Domenico Lepore
    • Intelligent Management Success Stories
    • Our Books
    • Clients
    • Expanding Spiral of Positive Systemic Results with Intelligent Management
  • Decalogue Methodology
    • Decalogue Methodology for Whole System Management
      • How to adopt systemic organization management
    • Management Must Evolve Fast – 15 Days to Radically Improve Company Performance
    • 10 Steps for Transformation
    • Systemic Organization Management
    • Resource Library for Systemic Management
    • Our Education Modules for Systemic Management
  • Contact
  • Our Whole System Blog
  • Intelligent Management Italia
You are here: Home / Systems Thinking / Identifying Assumptions to Unlock Innovation and Move Beyond the Crisis – Out of the Crisis Series Part 6

Jan 06 2021

Identifying Assumptions to Unlock Innovation and Move Beyond the Crisis – Out of the Crisis Series Part 6

In the previous part of this series, Part 5: Learning to Think Systemically to Make Informed Decisions and Pre-empt a Crisis, we saw how the Conflict Cloud Thinking Process helps us identify a situation of blockage and understand why this blockage exists in the first place. What keeps us stuck is the set of assumptions, or mental models that connect the elements of the conflict together like a connective tissue and keep it alive. We can think of these assumptions in terms of latent thoughts that have never been verbalized but that exist and influence our behavior as an organization. Only by verbalizing these assumptions and “surfacing” them can we challenge them. Identifying and challenging our assumptions is the royal road to moving beyond a situation of blockage, or crisis to unlock innovation and emerge with a breakthrough, systemic solution. In the Theory of Constraints this kind of solution is called an “Injection”.

We framed the current situation of crisis using this Thinking Process and worked on this dilemma with a highly successful client, based on their current reality following the outbreak of Coronavirus. This allowed us to verbalize the conflict more specifically but in a way that is still relevant for the current reality of many organizations living through this crisis. We verbalized the need in B connected with control as “preserve existing customers/relationships” and this leads to wanting to take the conservative action of “subordinate the development of our innovative solutions to the current economic scenario”. The need in C connected with vision becomes “increase value generated by new solutions” and this prompts to wanting to take the expansive action of “leverage the existing economic scenario to boost development of our innovative solutions”. The goal common to the two needs is “Create sustainable development within the new scenario”.

So, what are the thoughts/assumptions/mental models that create this conflict in the first place? How can we verbalize them and then find a way forward? The grey and blue boxes contain the assumptions that connect the elements of the conflict together and keep it in existence.

 

This is how we read the cloud once we have built it:

If  our goal (A) is to create sustainable development within the new scenario and sustainability requires continuity of relations, then, (B) we must preserve existing customers/relationships, and if in a moment of crisis, our clients are often reluctant to consider new investments for innovation, then this prompts us to adopt the position (D) Subordinate the development of our innovative solutions to the current economic scenario.

On the other hand,

If our goal (A) is to Create sustainable development within the new scenario, and sustainability requires the ability to develop and capitalize on innovative solutions, then we must (C) increase value generated by new solutions. And if value generated by new solutions opens new economic possibilities that overcome the current scenario then this prompts us to adopt the position (D’) Leverage the existing economic scenario  to boost development of our innovative solutions. We find ourselves stuck in this dilemma because we make the assumptions between D and D’: the economic impact of an innovative solution is not something measurable; an innovative solution threatens current equilibrium/status quo; the way we work and manage our organization after the crisis must mirror what existed before.

The conflict, or situation of blockage, will continue to exist unless we challenge the assumptions. The assumptions between the two pink boxes, D and D’ that contain the conflicting positions, are the ones we want to “attack”. In this way we demonstrate to ourselves that what is keeping us stuck is neither true nor valid and we have an alternative: we can choose to change our reality. We start to do this by verbalizing statements (Injections) that invalidate the assumptions but protect the needs in B and C. This is how we create a systemic, sustainable way forward.

We have identified two injections that can help any organization step out of the blockage/paralysis that this conflict depicts. They are:

  1. We develop and manage the company as an oriented network of projects (constraint-based)
  2. We accelerate the development and introduction of innovation through execution of constraint-based projects

 

 

The conflict cloud allows us to bring the multi-faceted network of formal and informal conversations taking place around the issues at stake into a condensed, workable and visual format. The assumptions, especially the ones between D and D’ represent the set of mental models that allow the conflict to exist. They represent the “cognitive constraint” that limits our ability to overcome such a conflict. By exposing these mental models in a linguistically correct format, we can leverage them to propel the current situation of reality towards one that is more desirable.

Other articles in this ‘Out of the Crisis’ series:

Part 1: A Serious Knowledge Gap Affecting Leaders and Executives

Part 2: What’s Wrong with Organizational Structures?

Part 3: Viral Insights from Managing Variation and Constraints

Part 4: How to Manage Decentralized Work

Part 5: Learning to Think Systemically to Make Informed Decisions and Pre-empt a Crisis

Contact: intelligentmanagement@sechel.ws
SCHEDULE AN INTRODUCTORY CALL WITH US

Intelligent Management has been guiding organizations to understand a systemic approach to managing complexity for over 20 years through our Decalogue management methodology. The Network of Projects organization design we developed is supported  by our Ess3ntial software for multi-project finite scheduling using the Critical Chain algorithm. 
We can learn to think systemically, see the big picture and connect the dots that otherwise we would not even see. Our business novel, ‘The Human Constraint’ , bought in 41 countries, presents several case histories through narrative form and illustrates that it is the way we think that we have to transform. That is the biggest challenge now. 

LEARN MORE

DR. DOMENICO LEPORE’S BOOK IS AVAILABLE NOW!
Leaders and managers are facing unprecedented change in the Digital Age. To compete they must shift to a systemic mindset and way of conducting operations.

Written by angela montgomery · Categorized: Systems Thinking, systems view of the world · Tagged: assumptions, injection, innovation, out of the crisis conflict, out of the crisis series

Search Form

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign up for our Blog and receive our White Paper ‘Out of the Crisis – A New Kind of Science for Management’

Sign up for our blog here to receive all our blog posts by e-mail.

Search Form

Recent Posts

  • A New Economics for Sustainable Prosperity – Out of the Crisis Series Part 7 January 13, 2021
  • Identifying Assumptions to Unlock Innovation and Move Beyond the Crisis – Out of the Crisis Series Part 6 January 6, 2021
  • Learning to Think Systemically to Make Informed Decisions and Pre-empt a Crisis – Out of the Crisis Part 5 December 30, 2020
  • How to Manage Decentralized Work – Out of the Crisis Series Part 4 December 23, 2020
  • Vital Insights from Managing Variation and Constraints – Out of the Crisis Series Part 3 December 16, 2020
  • What’s Wrong with Organizational Structure – Out of the Crisis Series Part 2 December 9, 2020
  • A Serious Knowledge Gap Affecting Leaders and Executives – Out of the Crisis Series Part 1 December 2, 2020
  • How to Prevent Chaos in Any Project or Initiative November 26, 2020
  • The Words We Use Can Change Our Reality – Shifting to a Systems View November 20, 2020
  • The Human Constraint – Going Beyond What We Think Is Possible November 11, 2020
  • Building Company Culture with Process flow November 6, 2020
  • Scheduling a Project – The Most Critical Activity For Every Business October 30, 2020
  • Transforming to an End-to-End Operating Model with a Whole System Technology October 22, 2020
  • How to Improve Company Culture and Performance with a Transformation Based on Competencies October 15, 2020
  • The Key Ingredients of an Organization re-design for Complexity and Speed October 8, 2020

Social Icons

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Recent Posts

  • A New Economics for Sustainable Prosperity – Out of the Crisis Series Part 7 January 13, 2021
  • Identifying Assumptions to Unlock Innovation and Move Beyond the Crisis – Out of the Crisis Series Part 6 January 6, 2021
  • Learning to Think Systemically to Make Informed Decisions and Pre-empt a Crisis – Out of the Crisis Part 5 December 30, 2020
  • How to Manage Decentralized Work – Out of the Crisis Series Part 4 December 23, 2020
  • Vital Insights from Managing Variation and Constraints – Out of the Crisis Series Part 3 December 16, 2020

Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Sign up for our blog

  • Home
  • Blog Theory of Constraints & Deming
  • Library
  • How to adopt systemic organization management
  • Knowledge Base for ‘The Human Constraint’
  • Contact Us

© 2020 Intelligent Management Inc. Canada

Privacy Policy