This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Intelligent Management

Deming and Theory of Constraints for CEOs and Executive Teams for the Age of Complexity. Ess3ntial Critical Chain Project Management

  • THE DECALOGUE METHOD
    • The Problem for Every Business
    • The Systemic Solution
    • synchronize competencies
    • How It Works
    • business insight and foresight through systemic cause and effect reasoning
    • Our Education Modules for Systemic Management
  • about us
    • Dr. Domenico Lepore
    • the founders
    • Intelligent Management Success Stories
    • Our Books
    • Clients
    • Expanding Spiral of Positive Systemic Results with Intelligent Management
  • blog & books
    • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
    • Our publications
  • ITALIA
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Systems Thinking / Can a Standard for Innovation Make Companies Smarter? – Standard of Innovation Part 5 of 5

Nov 21 2011

Can a Standard for Innovation Make Companies Smarter? – Standard of Innovation Part 5 of 5

InnovationThis post is by Dr. Domenico Lepore, an international expert on systems thinking for management.  He is the Founder of Intelligent Management Inc.

An organization requires great focus in order to keep up with the continuous innovation process. The focus needed can only be developed as a result of an improved “collective systemic intelligence”. By that we mean the ability the organization must develop to integrate cohesively the different activities that lead to a sustainable innovation. Is there a way to develop this intelligence and can a Standard help? The answer is yes.

How can that happen? By designing the organization  in the shape that nurtures systemic intelligence and the natural propensity towards innovation as a way of operating. A Standard for innovation can facilitate the design of processes and interdependencies that shape the organization appropriately.

Let’s recap on what is required.  In our previous post we identified two steps to achieving a reputable and useful standard:

1) Promote the concept that innovation is a process

2) Emphasize the role that top management must have  in providing an organizational framework to nurture innovation.

Shaping up the organization for sustainable innovation

A third step for a valuable standard is therefore to indicate the role that suitable organizational structures play in accelerating a fruitful innovation process. Invariably, obsolete functional/hierarchical models are a major hindrance to the innovation process. Why is this so?

The traditional hierarchical model of organizations harks back to an industrial model suitable for 19th century and totally inadequate for meaningful work today. A hierarchical matrix debases what we do by creating artificial barriers and ceilings and limits the ability of the organization to achieve its goal by rewarding local optima at the expense of the global goal. Science, civilization and individuals have evolved beyond the strictures of hierarchy/functions. Today we have the science, technology and know-how to shape organizations into what they intrinsically are – a system. We know that every living system is a network and we can work within them to maximize quality, flow and involvement, and to place innovation at the centre of all activity.

A reputable and useful standard should therefore act as catalyst for reconsidering existing self-limiting organizational charts.

The method for nurturing systemic intelligence for innovation

When organizations are shaped to sustain innovation and are populated by “thought poised” individuals, they require a rigorous method to support their thinking. This can be found in  the Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) model we discussed in Part 2 . As innovation can only be sustained if a strong learning cycle is in place, the fourth step to create a reputable and useful standard  is therefore the adoption of a scientific approach to the generation of innovation, not dissimilar from the one adopted by scientists to develop research.

In short:  a well-meaning and well-structured standard provides a unique opportunity to help us re-think our approach to innovation in a truly strategic way.

What is the role of government and institutions in supporting innovation?

Any organization capable of demonstrating a true commitment to continuous and sustainable innovation deserves the attention of government. By increasing its ability to compete through innovation, any company will increase its revenues, create more jobs and pay more taxes. Its growth will positively affect the economic cycle and it is fair to say that it should be encouraged.

By embracing the spirit of a well-designed Standard and by accepting the challenge of reshaping its strategy based on the acceleration of innovation, companies deserve to be aided in their endeavour. The money invested in these companies would then become fruitful and trigger a virtuous cycle from which society at large will benefit.

 

SUMMARY: 4 steps for a useful Standard for Innovation

1) Promote the concept that innovation is a process

2) Emphasize the role that top management must have  in providing an organizational framework to nurture innovation.

3) Indicate the role that suitable organizational structures play in accelerating a fruitful innovation process.

4)  Adopt a scientific approach to the generation of innovation (PDSA cycle).

See also:

Part 1 : A Word about words

Part 2: Imagination Does Not Equal Innovation

Part 3: The Interconnection of Leadership, Quality and Innovation

Part 4: Can a Standard Stimulate Innovation or Stifle It?

Innovation

Written by angela montgomery · Categorized: Systems Thinking · Tagged: Deming, Goldratt, innovation, intelligence, organizational design, PDSA, standard, Systems Thinking

Search Form

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.

Search Form

Recent Posts

  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization January 20, 2023
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18 January 11, 2023
  • Why HR Is So Much More than a Department – A Systemic Approach Part 17 December 21, 2022
  • Are Your Management Methods and Style Obsolete? December 2, 2022
  • Sell More of What Your Company Does with the Resources You Already Have (External Constraint) – A Systemic Approach Part 16 November 3, 2022
  • The Science of Thinking Breakthroughs from Dr. Domenico Lepore for Today’s Complex Business Environment October 10, 2022
  • Shifting Your Focus from Cost to Throughput is How You Can Thrive – a Systemic Approach Part 15 September 29, 2022
  • Are Companies with a Hierarchical/Functional Mindset Dinosaurs? A Systemic Approach Part 14 September 22, 2022
  • Company Functions Are Limiting Your Organization’s Performance – A Systemic Approach Part 13 September 13, 2022
  • End Silos and Dissatisfaction: Learn to Operate as a Network of Projects Organization August 29, 2022
  • Leading and Managing Change Effectively: It’s A Process that Includes You – A Systemic Approach Part 11 August 21, 2022
  • Controlling the Whole Organization through the Constraint – A Systemic Approach Part 10 August 14, 2022
  • Improving Flow Company Wide – A Systemic Approach Part 9 August 3, 2022
  • Why Your Organization’s Constraints are the Key to Success – A Systemic Approach Part 8 July 29, 2022
  • Working with Variation to Support Good Decision Making – A Systemic Approach Part 7 July 20, 2022

Social Icons

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo

Archives

  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Our Blog

  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18
  • Why HR  Is So Much More than a Department – A Systemic Approach Part 17
  • Are Your Management Methods and Style Obsolete?
  • Sell More of What Your Company Does with the Resources You Already Have (External Constraint) – A Systemic Approach Part 16

Recent Posts

  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization January 20, 2023
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18 January 11, 2023
  • Why HR Is So Much More than a Department – A Systemic Approach Part 17 December 21, 2022
  • Are Your Management Methods and Style Obsolete? December 2, 2022
  • Sell More of What Your Company Does with the Resources You Already Have (External Constraint) – A Systemic Approach Part 16 November 3, 2022

Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.
  • Home
  • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
  • Library
  • How to adopt systemic organization management
  • Knowledge Base for ‘The Human Constraint’
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Intelligent Management Inc. Canada

Privacy Policy