This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Intelligent Management

Deming and Theory of Constraints for CEOs and Executive Teams for the Age of Complexity. Ess3ntial Critical Chain Project Management

  • THE DECALOGUE METHOD
    • The Problem for Every Business
    • The Systemic Solution
    • synchronize competencies
    • How It Works
    • business insight and foresight through systemic cause and effect reasoning
    • Our Education Modules for Systemic Management
  • about us
    • Dr. Domenico Lepore
    • the founders
    • Intelligent Management Success Stories
    • Our Books
    • Clients
    • Expanding Spiral of Positive Systemic Results with Intelligent Management
  • blog & books
    • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
    • Our publications
  • ITALIA
  • Contact
You are here: Home / systems view of the world / Why Your Organization’s Constraints are the Key to Success – A Systemic Approach Part 8

Jul 29 2022

Why Your Organization’s Constraints are the Key to Success – A Systemic Approach Part 8

Dr. Eliyahu Goldratt’s main contribution to the theory of management has been to point out that any system is limited toward its goal by very few elements, the constraints. If we identify them we can manage them following the focusing steps that he developed. The Decalogue method leverages the intrinsic stability of a Deming-based system and suggests that the constraint can be “chosen” (one constraint) instead of being identified. In other words, we can always decide which constraint it is strategically more convenient to focus on as a leverage point and build the system accordingly. However, this requires a system made of low variation processes; this is why we can safely design our company around a strategically chosen constraint. Instead of cycling the five focusing steps of TOC—(1) identify the constraint, (2) exploit the constraint, (3) subordinate to the constraint, (4) elevate the constraint, and, if the constraint has moved, (5) go back to step (1)—we can make the system grow by appropriately choosing the constraint and sizing the capacity of all the feeding/subordinating processes coherently. Again, this is possible only because the variation in the system is low. This is Step Four of the Decalogue method.

Let’s look at how this works.

The word constraint may sound negative but it is very useful. This is true for two precise reasons:

  1. We need a constraint to facilitate the synchronization of the different processes in the system (the constraint is the element that dictates the pace at which value is generated).
  2. We need a constraint because an “unbalanced” system is more resilient and it is more easily managed when the impact of variation is taken into account

The constraint is what determines the pace/speed at which a system generates units of its goal. In for-profit companies, the units of the goal are linked to the generation of cash profit (value).

A system that is unbalanced around its constraint is like a tube with one section that is narrower than the rest: there is one phase/process/group of resources with less capacity than all the others.

Why do we manage a system through its constraint? It is because an unbalanced system is simpler and cheaper to manage. In an unbalanced system everything revolves around the constraint phase, and a detailed plan is necessary for this phase only. This schedule allows us to manage the whole operation. Reducing (global) variation in an unbalanced system means concentrating on and investing in the constraint phase only, not every single part of the process.

Markets that are stable and repetitive over time, both regarding quantity and product mix, are not very common. That is why following the variation in demand is very difficult. By unbalancing the system around its constraint, we can achieve a flexibility that is much more manageable because the problem of sizing capacity (and making any changes) only concerns the constraint and not every phase of the process.

Let’s repeat this crucial concept. The constraint determines how much the system can accomplish. Even if we choose to ignore it, this is still the case because every system has a constraint. Instead, when we consciously work with the constraint, we can leverage it to obtain the maximum throughput our system is capable of producing.

Protecting and Controlling the System: Buffer Management and the Constraint

The performance of our system is ensured by its predictability but we need a mechanism to protect it and control it. This is provided by the buffer and by its management. What is a buffer? Individual processes exhibit variation; two or more together do too, this is called covariance. The effect of covariance is a cumulated variation that can result in any sort of combination of these variances. Regardless of how little individual variation the processes of the system have, we do need a mechanism to protect the most critical part of our organization, the constraint. A buffer is a quantity of “time” that we position in front of the constraint to protect it from the cumulative variation that the system generates. Simply put, in synchronizing the processes that deliver the output of our organization, we ensure that what has to be worked on by the constraint gets in front of it “one buffer time ahead.”

Is there a precise and unequivocal recipe to size the buffer appropriately? No, and it doesn’t matter. If you understand control charts (see Part 7 of this series) the sizing is fairly obvious; if you don’t, you have bigger problems to cope with.

Controlling the whole organization through the Constraint

As Dr. Deming would most probably comment: “Let’s go back to serious business.” The real importance of the buffer is not in the protection from disruption, certainly not an irrelevant issue, but in the possibility to exert control over the functioning of the whole organization: if our processes are all predictable, then we can truly use the buffer as a mechanism to gather succinct, effective, and comprehensive information about the “state of the synchronization” of our company. Indeed, if we monitor the buffer with the use of a control chart, then the control becomes real insight, the goal of management.

Try it for yourself

Think about your organization. Which process or group of resources might you want to choose as a strategic constraint? The constraint needs to function continuously and smoothly as it dictates the pace of throughput. This means making sure there is enough capacity everywhere else in the organization to make sure the constraint can always perform. An analogy is a surgeon in an operating theatre – everything needs to be organized (resources, materials, procedures) so that the surgeon can focus on performing surgery and not have to worry about anything else. This creates the highest value for the patient.

PREVIOUS POSTS IN THIS SERIES:

Radically Improving Organizational Performance –  A Systemic Approach  to Management Part 1

Interdependencies and Establishing the Goal of Your Organization  A Systemic Approach to Management Part 2

How to Make the Best Decisions for Your Company and Measure What Matters – A Systemic Approach to Management Part 3

How to Drastically Improve Company Results through Healthy Interactions – A Systemic Approach to Management Part 4

Leadership for Complex Times – A Systemic Approach to Management Part 5

Create Stability and Predictability in Your Organization by understanding Variation – A Systemic Approach Part 6

Working with Variation to Support Good Decision Making – A Systemic Approach Part 7

To find out more about ten guided steps to a systemic leap for your company, contact Angela Montgomery at intelligentmanagement@sechel.ws
SCHEDULE AN INTRODUCTORY CALL WITH US

Intelligent Management works with decision makers with the authority and responsibility to make meaningful change. We have helped dozens of organizations to adopt a systemic approach to manage complexity and radically improve performance and growth for 25 years through our Decalogue management methodology. The Network of Projects organization design we developed is supported by our Ess3ntial software for multi-project finite scheduling based on the Critical Chain algorithm. 

See our latest books Moving the Chains: An Operational Solution for Embracing Complexity in the Digital Age by our Founder Dr. Domenico Lepore,   The Human Constraint – a digital business novel that has sold in 43 countries so far by Dr. Angela Montgomery and  ‘Quality, Involvement, Flow: The Systemic Organization’ from CRC Press, New York by Dr. Domenico Lepore, Dr. .Angela Montgomery and Dr. Giovanni Siepe.

 

Written by angela montgomery · Categorized: systems view of the world · Tagged: buffer, constraint, leverage point

Search Form

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.

Search Form

Recent Posts

  • Beyond Continuous Improvement: Deming and Goldratt together March 8, 2023
  • Confused about the Theory of Constraints? Don’t be! February 16, 2023
  • Why We Need Intelligent Management from Humans More than Ever February 2, 2023
  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization January 20, 2023
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18 January 11, 2023
  • Why HR Is So Much More than a Department – A Systemic Approach Part 17 December 21, 2022
  • Are Your Management Methods and Style Obsolete? December 2, 2022
  • Sell More of What Your Company Does with the Resources You Already Have (External Constraint) – A Systemic Approach Part 16 November 3, 2022
  • The Science of Thinking Breakthroughs from Dr. Domenico Lepore for Today’s Complex Business Environment October 10, 2022
  • Shifting Your Focus from Cost to Throughput is How You Can Thrive – a Systemic Approach Part 15 September 29, 2022
  • Are Companies with a Hierarchical/Functional Mindset Dinosaurs? A Systemic Approach Part 14 September 22, 2022
  • Company Functions Are Limiting Your Organization’s Performance – A Systemic Approach Part 13 September 13, 2022
  • End Silos and Dissatisfaction: Learn to Operate as a Network of Projects Organization August 29, 2022
  • Leading and Managing Change Effectively: It’s A Process that Includes You – A Systemic Approach Part 11 August 21, 2022
  • Controlling the Whole Organization through the Constraint – A Systemic Approach Part 10 August 14, 2022

Social Icons

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Our Blog

  • Beyond Continuous Improvement: Deming and Goldratt together
  • Confused about the Theory of Constraints? Don’t be!
  • Why We Need Intelligent Management from Humans More than Ever
  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18

Recent Posts

  • Beyond Continuous Improvement: Deming and Goldratt together March 8, 2023
  • Confused about the Theory of Constraints? Don’t be! February 16, 2023
  • Why We Need Intelligent Management from Humans More than Ever February 2, 2023
  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization January 20, 2023
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18 January 11, 2023

Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.
  • Home
  • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
  • Library
  • How to adopt systemic organization management
  • Knowledge Base for ‘The Human Constraint’
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Intelligent Management Inc. Canada

Privacy Policy