This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Intelligent Management

Deming and Theory of Constraints for CEOs and Executive Teams for the Age of Complexity. Ess3ntial Critical Chain Project Management

  • Home
  • about us
    • the founders
    • Dr. Domenico Lepore
    • Intelligent Management Success Stories
    • Our Books
    • Clients
    • Expanding Spiral of Positive Systemic Results with Intelligent Management
  • Decalogue Methodology
    • Decalogue Methodology for Whole System Management
      • How to adopt systemic organization management
    • Management Must Evolve Fast – 15 Days to Radically Improve Company Performance
    • 10 Steps for Transformation
    • Systemic Organization Management
    • Resource Library for Systemic Management
    • Our Education Modules for Systemic Management
  • Contact
  • Our Whole System Blog
  • Intelligent Management Italia
You are here: Home / Systems Thinking / Why a Performance Review Makes No Sense – a Systems View

Nov 01 2017

Why a Performance Review Makes No Sense – a Systems View

A company is not a collection of individuals. Contemporary science helps us to understand that organizations are, instead, “complex systems”, ruled by non-linear interactions that make it difficult to make any prediction when any change is effected. That’s why any approach to improve the system has to be “holistic”, and consider all the interactions/interdependencies.

The description of what everybody does, input and output, understanding the interdependencies and, finally, understanding variation associated with each process, is foundational to any form of “intelligent management”.

What is the guiding rule that should inspire any managerial decision? The job of Management is to work on the system and create a predictable environment; as Dr. Deming reminds us “the job of managers is to reduce variation”.

Statistical Process Control

Every human activity is affected by variation. Statistical Process Control (SPC), the main offspring of the Theory of Variation, is the body of knowledge that helps managers to act rationally for the improvement of the system. SPC is not a technique; it is a way of thinking that should be fostered by Top Management at every level in the organization.

The data and the way we collect them are as important as the analysis we perform on them. The starting point to understand the system and its different processes is to select key points where we monitor variation. Once we have identified these points, we can start with the analysis.

Measuring individuals

As Dr. Deming repeatedly pointed out, individual performances within an organization are the result of what the individual is capable of PLUS all the interaction and interdependencies in which they are immersed. As a result of these interactions Dr. Deming rightly claims that assessing individual performances in an organization is both dangerous and useless. This makes nonsense of a performance review.

Reducing variation was the essence of management for Deming. It is the lack of this awareness, which accounts for much of the failure in contemporary management practice. Budgeting and budgeting techniques are examples of a management approach governed by conformance to specifications. Like specs in production, they are “the voice of the customer.” They represent what we would like to achieve, or what the customer is asking us to deliver. Neither of the two has anything to do with what we can achieve or deliver. They are based on estimates that are often arbitrary. These estimates almost invariably translate into equally arbitrary targets. The achievement of these targets, or failure to do so, becomes the basis for managerial decisions. These decisions shape the way in which people relate to the organization, the way they work and, ultimately, the way they are in the world.

Creating the environment

According to Deming, the role of a leader is to create the environment that allows people to take joy in their work, use their abilities and fulfill their potential. In order to do that the leader must eliminate fear in the workplace. As Dr. Deming points out there are two circumstances to consider:

  1. The worker has achieved statistical control of his/her work.
  2. The worker has not yet achieved statistical control of his/her work.

Again, the two states will call for a different set of actions, none of which entails blaming the worker. We must remember that poor performances are very often due to lack of understanding of the system that people are operating in and, in many cases, the answer is in training.

“Eighty-five per cent of the reasons for failure are deficiencies in the systems and processes rather than the employee. The role of management is to change the process rather than badgering the individuals to do better.”

Deming’s work represents the most fundamental contribution to achieving quality. The goal of his work is to acquire profound knowledge of the impact that actions have on a system. This approach encourages the study of effects in order to search for the root causes which determined them. Consequently, the focus of attention opens up from the narrow realm of emphasizing results to the wider possibilities of examining processes. This is the key to achieving greater control over our actions and increasing our chances of predicting their outcome.

Measuring Performance

This extract is from Dr. Deming’s last interview before his death in Industry Week where he addresses performance measurement specifically:

Dr. Deming: It’s extremely important to understand that there are two kinds of variation. The variation that comes from common causes and the variation from something special.

IW: How do you recognize the difference between the two?

Dr. Deming: That’s a function of the control chart. The control chart is a gift from Dr. Walter A. Shewhart, who invented it while working at the Bell Telephone Laboratories around 1924. What happens within the control limits belongs to the system, a common cause. A point outside the control limits would indicate a special cause. The usual procedure is that when anything happens, [we] suppose that somebody did it. Who did it? Pin a necklace on him. He’s our culprit. He’s the one who did it. That’s wrong, entirely wrong. Chances are good, almost overwhelming, that what happened, happened as a consequence of the system that he works in, not from his own efforts. In other words, performance cannot be measured. You only measure the combined effect of the system and his efforts. You cannot untangle the two. It is very important, I believe, that performance cannot be measured.

Tim Stevens | Industry Week interview, Jan 17, 1994

Sign up to our blog here and shift your thinking towards broader, systemic possibilities for yourself and your organization. Intelligent Management provides education and training  on systemic management, W. Edwards Deming’s management philosophy and the Theory of Constraints  (Decalogue methodology) in North America and Europe.

About the Author

Angela Montgomery Ph.D. is Partner and Co-founder of Intelligent Management and author of the business novel+ website  The Human Constraint that has sold in over 20 countries. She is co-author with Dr. Domenico Lepore, founder, and Dr. Giovanni Siepe of  ‘Quality, Involvement, Flow: The Systemic Organization’  from CRC Press, New York.

 

 

Written by angela montgomery · Categorized: Systems Thinking, systems view of the world · Tagged: Deming, performance measurement, performance review, SPC, variation

Search Form

Comments

  1. Robert Rogerson says

    November 1, 2017 at 6:17 PM

    I’ve struggled so long with why public universities are so financially inefficient, especially nowadays when restaurants, bookstores, coffee bars and parking have either been handed to the private sector or required to operate for profit and without subsidy. I see now that the obsession with individual performance analysis and the payment of people to do it, is so deeply ingrained in contemporary public institutions, it constitutes a massive burden to carry. Instinctively, every faculty member thinks it’s a total waste of time! The growing crowds of overpaid administrators think faculty are self interested. Faculty are certain it is the administrators who are self interested. How to break this “A says; B says”?? More intelligent management certainly, but leaders also who are prepared to stand up and face the source of the problem: the interference of government in university management.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign up for our Blog and receive our White Paper ‘Out of the Crisis – A New Kind of Science for Management’

Sign up for our blog here to receive all our blog posts by e-mail.

Search Form

Recent Posts

  • A New Economics for Sustainable Prosperity – Out of the Crisis Series Part 7 January 13, 2021
  • Identifying Assumptions to Unlock Innovation and Move Beyond the Crisis – Out of the Crisis Series Part 6 January 6, 2021
  • Learning to Think Systemically to Make Informed Decisions and Pre-empt a Crisis – Out of the Crisis Part 5 December 30, 2020
  • How to Manage Decentralized Work – Out of the Crisis Series Part 4 December 23, 2020
  • Vital Insights from Managing Variation and Constraints – Out of the Crisis Series Part 3 December 16, 2020
  • What’s Wrong with Organizational Structure – Out of the Crisis Series Part 2 December 9, 2020
  • A Serious Knowledge Gap Affecting Leaders and Executives – Out of the Crisis Series Part 1 December 2, 2020
  • How to Prevent Chaos in Any Project or Initiative November 26, 2020
  • The Words We Use Can Change Our Reality – Shifting to a Systems View November 20, 2020
  • The Human Constraint – Going Beyond What We Think Is Possible November 11, 2020
  • Building Company Culture with Process flow November 6, 2020
  • Scheduling a Project – The Most Critical Activity For Every Business October 30, 2020
  • Transforming to an End-to-End Operating Model with a Whole System Technology October 22, 2020
  • How to Improve Company Culture and Performance with a Transformation Based on Competencies October 15, 2020
  • The Key Ingredients of an Organization re-design for Complexity and Speed October 8, 2020

Social Icons

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Recent Posts

  • A New Economics for Sustainable Prosperity – Out of the Crisis Series Part 7 January 13, 2021
  • Identifying Assumptions to Unlock Innovation and Move Beyond the Crisis – Out of the Crisis Series Part 6 January 6, 2021
  • Learning to Think Systemically to Make Informed Decisions and Pre-empt a Crisis – Out of the Crisis Part 5 December 30, 2020
  • How to Manage Decentralized Work – Out of the Crisis Series Part 4 December 23, 2020
  • Vital Insights from Managing Variation and Constraints – Out of the Crisis Series Part 3 December 16, 2020

Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Sign up for our blog

  • Home
  • Blog Theory of Constraints & Deming
  • Library
  • How to adopt systemic organization management
  • Knowledge Base for ‘The Human Constraint’
  • Contact Us

© 2020 Intelligent Management Inc. Canada

Privacy Policy