This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Intelligent Management

Deming and Theory of Constraints for CEOs and Executive Teams for the Age of Complexity. Ess3ntial Critical Chain Project Management

  • Home
  • about us
    • the founders
    • Dr. Domenico Lepore
    • Intelligent Management Success Stories
    • Our Books
    • Clients
    • Expanding Spiral of Positive Systemic Results with Intelligent Management
  • Decalogue Methodology
    • Decalogue Methodology for Whole System Management
      • How to adopt systemic organization management
    • Management Must Evolve Fast – 15 Days to Radically Improve Company Performance
    • 10 Steps for Transformation
    • Systemic Organization Management
    • Resource Library for Systemic Management
    • Our Education Modules for Systemic Management
  • Contact
  • Our Whole System Blog
  • Intelligent Management Italia
You are here: Home / Systems Thinking / Looking at the Core Conflict in Education and Innovation Today

Dec 05 2011

Looking at the Core Conflict in Education and Innovation Today

Core Conflict in Education and Innovation TodayIn this post we will be looking at what we consider to be the Core Conflict regarding  Education and Innovation. We have analyzed this conflict using a rigorous tool that combines intuition with logical analysis to produce a solution that is a non-linear synthesis. This Thinking Process Tool is known as the Core Conflict Cloud from the Theory of Constraints.

In the previous posts, Prof. Pagano highlighted the challenges facing educators today regarding innovation. Students may appear to be less engaged in their conventional studies. This may be connected to the remarkable advances in technology that have transformed our daily lives but that have not yet permeated the school environment, practices and curricula.

The Systemic paradigm

We are experiencing a radical shift in our understanding of nature from a mechanistic worldview to one that is ecological or systemic. Understanding and acting appropriately and effectively within this new paradigm requires an ability to think and act systemically. The current crises and lack of thorough solutions are a dramatic demonstration of how we are lagging behind in our ability to cope with reality as systemic, interconnected and totally immersed in interdependencies. Our reality is made up of networks of networks. This requires, quite simply, a new way of thinking, understanding and acting, and nowhere is this more relevant than in our schools.

What are schools for?

Schools have the task of forming young people to become productive members of society and this requires innovation. We believe it is fair to state that the goal of our education system is to develop individual potential harmoniously within a productive and happy contemporary society. In order to achieve this goal, we need  to develop an education system based on students’ ability to integrate productively and harmoniously with society. On the the other hand, to achieve the goal we need to develop an education system based on nurturing individual potential. The first need for integration leads us to want to:

Design a curriculum based on standardized knowledge and testing

whereas the second need for nurturing individual potential leads us to want to:

Design a curriculum based on flexibility and personalization

And this conflict keeps us stuck when it comes to making the reforms our education systems so desperately need.

Out of the conflict

How can we emerge from this impasse? Whereas our needs must always be respected, the conflicting positions are the result of a set of mental models, in other words, assumptions. Once we are willing to invalidate certain assumptions, we open up the pathway to a breakthrough solution.

The following diagram shows the formal representation of the Conflict Cloud. The orange box A contains the goal, boxes B and C contain the needs, and D and D’ are the conflicting positions. The blue boxes contain the assumptions.

Core Conflict in Education and Innovation Today

 

Once we have verbalized the assumptions that keep us stuck between D and D’, we can look for ways to invalidate those assumptions with solutions. These solutions are referred to in the Theory of Constraints as ‘injections’ and they can be found in the pink box below.

Core Conflict in Education and Innovation Today

Later in the week we will look at those solutions in more detail.

Related posts:

Educating for Complexity: How Do We Transform Schools into Centres of Innovation?

Innovation and Education: The School of Evolution

Reality is Not Made Up of Cycles but Complexity: Education and Innovation Pt. 2

Looking at the Core Conflict in Education and Innovation Today (Pt. 3)

 

 

 

 

Written by angela montgomery · Categorized: Systems Thinking · Tagged: conflict cloud, curriculum, education, innovation, interdependencies, network, non-linear, paradigm, potential, school, systemic, Systems Thinking, Thinking Process Tools

Search Form

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign up for our Blog and receive our White Paper ‘Out of the Crisis – A New Kind of Science for Management’

Sign up for our blog here to receive all our blog posts by e-mail.

Search Form

Recent Posts

  • A New Economics for Sustainable Prosperity – Out of the Crisis Series Part 7 January 13, 2021
  • Identifying Assumptions to Unlock Innovation and Move Beyond the Crisis – Out of the Crisis Series Part 6 January 6, 2021
  • Learning to Think Systemically to Make Informed Decisions and Pre-empt a Crisis – Out of the Crisis Part 5 December 30, 2020
  • How to Manage Decentralized Work – Out of the Crisis Series Part 4 December 23, 2020
  • Vital Insights from Managing Variation and Constraints – Out of the Crisis Series Part 3 December 16, 2020
  • What’s Wrong with Organizational Structure – Out of the Crisis Series Part 2 December 9, 2020
  • A Serious Knowledge Gap Affecting Leaders and Executives – Out of the Crisis Series Part 1 December 2, 2020
  • How to Prevent Chaos in Any Project or Initiative November 26, 2020
  • The Words We Use Can Change Our Reality – Shifting to a Systems View November 20, 2020
  • The Human Constraint – Going Beyond What We Think Is Possible November 11, 2020
  • Building Company Culture with Process flow November 6, 2020
  • Scheduling a Project – The Most Critical Activity For Every Business October 30, 2020
  • Transforming to an End-to-End Operating Model with a Whole System Technology October 22, 2020
  • How to Improve Company Culture and Performance with a Transformation Based on Competencies October 15, 2020
  • The Key Ingredients of an Organization re-design for Complexity and Speed October 8, 2020

Social Icons

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Recent Posts

  • A New Economics for Sustainable Prosperity – Out of the Crisis Series Part 7 January 13, 2021
  • Identifying Assumptions to Unlock Innovation and Move Beyond the Crisis – Out of the Crisis Series Part 6 January 6, 2021
  • Learning to Think Systemically to Make Informed Decisions and Pre-empt a Crisis – Out of the Crisis Part 5 December 30, 2020
  • How to Manage Decentralized Work – Out of the Crisis Series Part 4 December 23, 2020
  • Vital Insights from Managing Variation and Constraints – Out of the Crisis Series Part 3 December 16, 2020

Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Sign up for our blog

  • Home
  • Blog Theory of Constraints & Deming
  • Library
  • How to adopt systemic organization management
  • Knowledge Base for ‘The Human Constraint’
  • Contact Us

© 2020 Intelligent Management Inc. Canada

Privacy Policy