This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Intelligent Management

Deming and Theory of Constraints for CEOs and Executive Teams for the Age of Complexity. Ess3ntial Critical Chain Project Management

  • THE DECALOGUE METHOD
    • The Problem for Every Business
    • The Systemic Solution
    • synchronize competencies
    • How It Works
    • business insight and foresight through systemic cause and effect reasoning
    • Our Education Modules for Systemic Management
  • about us
    • Dr. Domenico Lepore
    • the founders
    • Intelligent Management Success Stories
    • Our Books
    • Clients
    • Expanding Spiral of Positive Systemic Results with Intelligent Management
  • blog & books
    • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
    • Our publications
  • ITALIA
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Learning Centre / What is a Systemic Organization? / Managing Non-Physical Constraints

Managing Non-Physical Constraints

Managing Non-Physical Constraints

The Thinking Processes (TP) were designed by Dr. Goldratt to help people to think better, faster and develop seemingly “impossible” solutions to their problems in a repeatable and reliable manner.

They do so by enabling the correct verbalization, in a precisely defined linguistic context, of the “assumptions” we make about the situation we are analyzing. These assumptions, generally speaking, reflect mental models and limiting beliefs that “constrain” our mind in the search for a solution.

The exercise that the Thinking Processes help us carry out is to logically challenge and invalidate these limiting beliefs. We perform this complex cognitive task in steps:

  • First, we clearly verbalize the assumptions between the logical entities making up the conflict, hence painting the “Current Reality”
  • Second, we concentrate on those between B-D and C-D’ hence ensuring the “reality” of the conflict.
  • Third, we focus on what make us believe that D-D’ are in conflict, i.e. why we feel that D and D’ cannot coexist.

Managing non-physical constraints means, in essence, coming to term with our limiting beliefs and finding a way to overcome them. In fact, unlike physical constraints (the ones defined by the lack of some sort of physical quantity – i.e. the ones we encounter in managing a production flow) to which we apply the steps of focusing (identify, exploit, subordinate), when we deal with non-physical limitations we should right away find a way to eliminate them. As Dr. Goldratt has pointed out repeatedly: “we subordinate to physical constraints but we elevate (eliminate) non-physical ones”.

Screen shot 2012-03-23 at 1.09.40 PM

There are several proven solutions for the management of physical constraints; DBR and Buffer Management for production; Critical Chain for new product development and Project Management; Replenishment for distribution; these are the most well known. They are based on very solid algorithms and the TP facilitate the understanding of their logic. Even for Marketing and Sales a very powerfully engineered solution exists and it is called “External Constraint”.

How about everything else? How about the never-ending list of strategic issues that make or break a company? This is precisely the strength and the relevance of the Thinking Processes. Any issue, from M&A to maintenance, from IT investments to new ventures, from training design to infrastructure upgrade, can be framed with the use of the TP and tackled in a way that often leads to a breakthrough and always to a win-win solution. The real conceptual hurdle is to believe that an innovative solution can be systematically developed and implemented. This is precisely the challenge in front of those who choose to adopt the TP as a method for managing the organization. Maybe, the issue at stake here can be summarized with a precise conflict:

Adopt the Thinking Processes of TOC vs. Do not adopt the Thinking Process Tools of TOC. Interesting, eh?

Going forward, this website will strive to provide examples of using the Thinking Processes and the Decalogue to address non-physical constraints. A small example can be found in the companion book to this website.

See Sechel: logic, language and tools to manage any organization as a network, Domenico Lepore, Intelligent Management Inc. 2011

 

Member Content

  • What is a System?
  • The Interconnection of Leadership, Quality and Innovation (open access)
  • What is a Systemic Organization?
    • Variation (open access)
    • What is a Constraint? (open access)
    • Decalogue Methodology (open access)
    • Quality (open access)
    • Interdependencies
      • Human Relations
      • Cognition
  • How Can You Manage Change?
    • Why Change? Part One
    • Why Change? Part Two
    • Not Change But Transformation
    • What Are the Thinking Processes? (open access)
  • What Does Complexity Mean and How Can We Manage It?
    • Life Sciences
    • Non-Linear Dynamics
    • Networks
    • The Organization as a Network of Projects
    • Fractals
  • The Applications from the Theory of Constraints
    • New Product Development & Innovation
    • Managing External Constraint – Marketing & Sales
    • Managing Non-Physical Constraints
    • Synchronized Management (Drum Buffer Rope)
  • What Are the Thinking Process Tools? (open access)
    • Real Life Example of a Future Reality Tree – The Proprint Case Study
    • Building the Core Conflict Cloud by Dr. Domenico Lepore
  • How Can You Optimize Resources and Processes?
    • Synchronized Management (Drum Buffer Rope)
    • Process Synchronization
    • Resource Optimization (open access)
    • Data Management
    • Info & Measurements
  • What Makes an Information System Useful?

Our Blog

  • Beyond Continuous Improvement: Deming and Goldratt together
  • Confused about the Theory of Constraints? Don’t be!
  • Why We Need Intelligent Management from Humans More than Ever
  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18

Recent Posts

  • Beyond Continuous Improvement: Deming and Goldratt together March 8, 2023
  • Confused about the Theory of Constraints? Don’t be! February 16, 2023
  • Why We Need Intelligent Management from Humans More than Ever February 2, 2023
  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization January 20, 2023
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18 January 11, 2023

Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.
  • Home
  • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
  • Library
  • How to adopt systemic organization management
  • Knowledge Base for ‘The Human Constraint’
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Intelligent Management Inc. Canada

Privacy Policy