This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Intelligent Management

Deming and Theory of Constraints for CEOs and Executive Teams for the Age of Complexity. Ess3ntial Critical Chain Project Management

  • THE DECALOGUE METHOD
    • The Problem for Every Business
    • The Systemic Solution
    • synchronize competencies
    • How It Works
    • business insight and foresight through systemic cause and effect reasoning
    • Our Education Modules for Systemic Management
  • about us
    • Dr. Domenico Lepore
    • the founders
    • Intelligent Management Success Stories
    • Our Books
    • Clients
    • Expanding Spiral of Positive Systemic Results with Intelligent Management
  • blog & books
    • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
    • Our publications
  • ITALIA
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Systems Thinking / A Path of Least Resistance for Managing Organizations? It’s Scientific.

Oct 10 2014

A Path of Least Resistance for Managing Organizations? It’s Scientific.

 


The path of least resistance is a familiar concept from nature. It can be observed in patterns of water on glass. Flow is created where least energy is required. But is there a way to make this principle apply to the way organizations work?  There is, and  we take a look at it here. 

 

An example from physics

A point particle that moves on a surface is “constrained” by the surface so that it can only move along it in certain directions. In other words, the surface “limits” the degree of freedom of the particle. 

 

However, this limitation, doesn’t mean that the particle cannot move. As a matter of fact, we know that motion is always possible. Once the actual forces acting on the particle are taken into account, the particle follows a path that obeys something known as “the principle (path) of least action”. The more familiar term for this is the path of least resistance.

 

Organizations are dynamical systems

Is there a “path of least resistance” for an organization? The answer is yes, and we find it by identifying the constraint.

The first chapter of any serious book on Analytical Mechanics always starts with the definition of “constraint”. The line of reasoning follows the idea that any dynamical system is constrained. What has that got to do with organizations? This is the great insight of Dr.  Eliyahu Goldratt who developed the Theory of Constraints. He realized that organizations are also dynamical systems and they also have constraints. By leveraging the constraint, performance can be dramatically improved.

Some people may be under the impression that this concept only applies to limited areas of an organization, like a production line. In fact it is possible to identify the constraint of an entire organization to improve overall performance. We can actually decide to choose strategically the constraint of the organization in order to manage it. When we do this, we are able to find  the “path of least resistance ” for managing the entire organization.

This is the essence of the Theory of Constraints.

Organizing around the constraint

Anchoring the system to one point, the constraint, and understanding the interdependencies (the actual forces in a dynamical system) is the way we manage and lead it toward the maximization of Throughput (value), which corresponds, in dynamics, to the path of least resistance. 

In our methodology at Intelligent Management, we take organizations through a ten-step process that involves identifying the constraint, but we embrace two apparently different ways of managing, both of which are systemic:

  • identification of interdependencies, understanding variation and its impact on the network;
  • identification (choice) of the constraint, exploitation and subordination of the network to it.

The reason why we need both of these approaches is because one substantially fortifies the other. Understanding and managing variation creates stability and predictability, and identifying and subordinating to the constraint radically focuses and simplifies the efforts of the organization.

Ten steps to propel performance and continuous improvement

The ten steps of  ‘The Decalogue’ methodology represent a path the organization can follow in order to manage complexity and to acquire the right behaviour for continuous improvement:

  1. Establish the goal of the system, the units of measurement and the operational measurement (without a common goal there is no system);
  2. Understand the system (draw the interdependencies);
  3. Make the system stable (understand variation and its impact on the network, make sure that the oscillation of the processes is statistically stable);
  4. Build the system around the constraint (subordinate the organization to the constraint, the only part of the system that can never stay idle!);
  5.  Manage the constraint (protect the constraint from the intrinsic variation present inside the system with a “buffer” – buffer management);
  6. Reduce variation at (of) the constraint and the main processes (wider variation implies poorer management; low variation improves predictability, reduces inventory and WIP);
  7. Create a suitable management structure (choose the right people, improve/change the network of interdependencies to improve the performance of the system);
  8. Eliminate the “External Constraint”(sell the excess capacity, if present);
  9. Where possible, bring the constraint inside the organization and fix it there (an “internal”constraint is much easier to manage than an external constraint);
  10. Create a Continuous Learning Program (motivate people to learn, improve the system through personal improvement).

Path of Transformation

Working through these ten steps is not just about change, it is a transformation process. As Dr. Deming has said, “The prevailing style of management must undergo transformation.” This process not only affects the organization but also the people working within it. This can be avery positive experience. As Deming puts it, “The individual, transformed, will perceive new meaning to his life, to events, to numbers, to interactions
between people.”

However, this path of transformation is not simple. Conflicts and misunderstandings arise, personal biases clash and all this must be managed to smooth the path of change. Thanks to Dr. Goldratt, we have access to a full set of thinking process tools. In almost 20 years of application, we have seen how these tools can effectively overcome the “change vs. don’t change” dilemma. Consistent use of the tools can harmonize behaviours and allow people to follow procedures (the rules of the system) with success.

The ten steps provide a complete solution to managing complexity and change. It is not a path that is suitable for everyone, but it provides the foundation for an ethical, sustainable and ultimately more rewarding market. 

This post was jointly authored by the Intelligent Management team, Dr. Domenico Lepore, Dr. Giovanni Siepe and Dr. Angela Montgomery.

For further discussion of systemic thinking for systemic action and relevant tools, see Angela Montgomery’s new business novel+website, ‘The Human Constraint’. 2 free chapters available for download.

Written by angela montgomery · Categorized: Systems Thinking · Tagged: change, complexity, Decalogue methodology, Deming, Goldratt, path of least resistance, transformation

Search Form

Comments

  1. Hamzah says

    December 2, 2014 at 3:48 PM

    Create an acceptance pattern to make people accept & adapt new transformation by making them easily soluble.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.

Search Form

Recent Posts

  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization January 20, 2023
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18 January 11, 2023
  • Why HR Is So Much More than a Department – A Systemic Approach Part 17 December 21, 2022
  • Are Your Management Methods and Style Obsolete? December 2, 2022
  • Sell More of What Your Company Does with the Resources You Already Have (External Constraint) – A Systemic Approach Part 16 November 3, 2022
  • The Science of Thinking Breakthroughs from Dr. Domenico Lepore for Today’s Complex Business Environment October 10, 2022
  • Shifting Your Focus from Cost to Throughput is How You Can Thrive – a Systemic Approach Part 15 September 29, 2022
  • Are Companies with a Hierarchical/Functional Mindset Dinosaurs? A Systemic Approach Part 14 September 22, 2022
  • Company Functions Are Limiting Your Organization’s Performance – A Systemic Approach Part 13 September 13, 2022
  • End Silos and Dissatisfaction: Learn to Operate as a Network of Projects Organization August 29, 2022
  • Leading and Managing Change Effectively: It’s A Process that Includes You – A Systemic Approach Part 11 August 21, 2022
  • Controlling the Whole Organization through the Constraint – A Systemic Approach Part 10 August 14, 2022
  • Improving Flow Company Wide – A Systemic Approach Part 9 August 3, 2022
  • Why Your Organization’s Constraints are the Key to Success – A Systemic Approach Part 8 July 29, 2022
  • Working with Variation to Support Good Decision Making – A Systemic Approach Part 7 July 20, 2022

Social Icons

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo

Archives

  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Our Blog

  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18
  • Why HR  Is So Much More than a Department – A Systemic Approach Part 17
  • Are Your Management Methods and Style Obsolete?
  • Sell More of What Your Company Does with the Resources You Already Have (External Constraint) – A Systemic Approach Part 16

Recent Posts

  • Why Complexity Impacts Your Organization January 20, 2023
  • Continuous Learning is a Must for Organizations Today – A Systemic Approach Part 18 January 11, 2023
  • Why HR Is So Much More than a Department – A Systemic Approach Part 17 December 21, 2022
  • Are Your Management Methods and Style Obsolete? December 2, 2022
  • Sell More of What Your Company Does with the Resources You Already Have (External Constraint) – A Systemic Approach Part 16 November 3, 2022

Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Sign Up For Our Systems View Blog!

Fields marked with a * are required.
  • Home
  • Blog Theory of Constraints and Deming
  • Library
  • How to adopt systemic organization management
  • Knowledge Base for ‘The Human Constraint’
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Intelligent Management Inc. Canada

Privacy Policy