Intelligent Management

Transforming silo thinking to systems optimization through Systemic Thinking for complex problems based on Deming and the Theory of Constraints.

  • Home
  • about us
    • the founders
    • Dr. Domenico Lepore
    • What We Do
    • Clients
  • Systemic Management
    • Systemic Organization Management
    • 10 Steps for Transformation
    • Books
    • Resource Library
    • Our Education Modules for Systemic Management
  • Blog
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Systems Thinking / How to Predict the Future in Uncertain Times Part 2

Jul 06 2017

How to Predict the Future in Uncertain Times Part 2

Screen Shot 2017-07-06 at 4.20.54 PM

In Part Two of this article on predicting the future with science, we look at the tool from Statistical Process Control that helps us understand behaviour patterns in our processes so we can make more informed decisions.

When is a process predictable?

We say that a process is “predictable”  when it is in a state of  “statistical control”. This means when we measure the process and put the data on a control chart, it oscillates between its natural limits (and complies with some other minor rules).

When a process is in this state, we say it is “predictable” because, if nothing changes, it will continue to oscillate in a predictable manner, between its limits.

IF or WHEN it starts to deviate from the state of statistical stability (its oscillation goes beyond the limits), only at that moment can we say that we detect an “anomaly”, or an extra-ordinary event. Unfortunately, it is only after the fact that we can say that an extra-ordinary event has happened. But at least we have a criterion to sift it out and recognize it as such.

Misleading charts

Below is an example of a “run chart” of a process. It represents the arrival time at the office of an “average” person.

The yellow line is the statistical average of the series of data, and the arrival time oscillates between, more or less, 7.00am and 9.50am. It is a considerably wide range.
If we just look at the series of points, we are led to think that day number 12 and day number 22 are “anomalies” (they are far from the average and they make it look as though “Mr. Average” is late).

This interpretation is a typical mistake we make when we look just at the numbers, without any reference system to give us a meaningful context.

Useful charts

Let’s look at this process in a less naive way. A reference system is provided by Statistical Process Control (SPC) so now we have some context. If we calculate the natural limits of oscillation and we draw them on the chart, this is the result:

The process of  “Mr. Average goes to the office” is in fact IN CONTROL. It oscillates between its natural limits (the limits are CALCULATED, not imposed arbitrarily).
The word “predictability” now takes on a different meaning. The process is in control (it is predictable) because it oscillates between the limits, and we can say it will continue to oscillate between them until “something special” happens.

Let’s look at another process; this is  the process of “Mr. Average’s colleague going to work”. The graphic below shows what that process looks like on a simple “run chart”:

The yellow line is the statistical average of the series of data, and the arrival time oscillates between, more or less, 7.40am and 8.20am. Compared with Mr. Average’s arrival time the range is much more narrow, and it looks more “reliable”.

Unfortunately, we cannot rely on impressions to know that everything is all right. Look what happens when we add the natural limits of oscillation:

The process is “out of control”, which means (according to SPC) that the process is unpredictable.

The implication of this statement is the following. Suppose that the boss of the two employees has to organize a meeting in the morning: he will know that, according to the two different behaviors, Mr. Average is likely to be present at any time after 9.50am. On the other hand, his colleague’s presence would be uncertain because of his unpredictability.

Understanding reality

What is the meaning of all this? People may claim to foresee upcoming extra-ordinary events, and we do not understand how they possess this vision, i.e. this ability to predict or make forecasts. Giving names to the events such as “Black Swans” doesn’t help us very much in understanding reality. For example, we could have used the name “Black Swans” for events 12 and 22 on the run chart of Mr. Average.

What we do know, instead, is that it is impossible to predict “extra-ordinary” events. What we can do is distinguish “noise” from “signal”. This means there is no need to base important choices on our gut feel when we can base them on simple statistics applied to reality. We can avoid crying wolf unnecessarily.

It may be a dream, but if we apply a little science and a modicum of intelligence to the understanding of the world, our future can be so much better.

Dr. Giovanni Siepe

See Part One of this article: How to Predict the Future in Uncertain Times 

Quality, Involvement, Flow

Sign up to our blog here and shift your thinking towards broader, systemic possibilities for yourself and your organization. Intelligent Management provides education and training  on W. Edwards Deming’s management philosophy and the Theory of Constraints  (Decalogue methodology) in North America and Europe.

About the Author

Angela Montgomery Ph.D. is Partner and Co-founder of Intelligent Management and author of the business novel+ website  The Human Constraint . This downloadable novel uses narrative to look at how the Deming approach and the Theory of Constraints can create the organization of the future, based on collaboration, network and social innovation.  She is co-author with Dr. Domenico Lepore, founder, and Dr. Giovanni Siepe of  ‘Quality, Involvement, Flow: The Systemic Organization’  from CRC Press, New York.

Written by angela montgomery · Categorized: Systems Thinking, systems view of the world · Tagged: predict, process behavior, SPC, statistical process control, systems view, W. Edwards Deming

Search Form

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Form

Sign Up For Blog and don’t forget to sign up on our content library page for member content!

Sign up for our blog here to receive all our blog posts by e-mail.

Recent Posts

  • Managing as a Whole System – A New Learning Path April 24, 2018
  • Creativity, Reliability and Predictability – Are They at Odds? April 19, 2018
  • Four Fundamental Knowledge Areas for Leaders and Managers Today April 17, 2018
  • The Science of Why Extra Effort Does Not Equal Extra Productivity in an Organization April 10, 2018
  • Fixing Strategy Failure – a Systems View April 5, 2018
  • From Silos to System: How to Build an Organization Fit for Complexity April 3, 2018
  • 3 Major Symptoms that Your Organization Has Silo Sickness March 28, 2018
  • The Silo Peril and Breaking Down Barriers March 27, 2018
  • Systemic Tools against Bias for Good Decisions about Risk March 22, 2018
  • Exploit the Constraint, Not Your People (Are you listening, Amazon?) March 20, 2018
  • Managing Risk through a Leverage Point (constraint) – A Systems View March 15, 2018
  • Understanding Uncertainty and Systemic Risk in Organizations March 13, 2018
  • Managing Risk and Fear March 7, 2018
  • Design and Manage Your Organization as a Whole System or Underperform March 6, 2018
  • The Quality Conundrum and the Heritage of W. Edwards Deming March 5, 2018

Social Icons

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Archives

  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Recent Posts

  • Managing as a Whole System – A New Learning Path April 24, 2018
  • Creativity, Reliability and Predictability – Are They at Odds? April 19, 2018
  • Four Fundamental Knowledge Areas for Leaders and Managers Today April 17, 2018
  • The Science of Why Extra Effort Does Not Equal Extra Productivity in an Organization April 10, 2018
  • Fixing Strategy Failure – a Systems View April 5, 2018
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Library
  • What We Do
  • Knowledge Base for ‘The Human Constraint’

© 2018 Intelligent Management Inc. Canada